Guys .. Thank you very much for all your input and letting me know about
solution.

Thanks

Nilesh

On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Di Bias, Steve <[email protected]>wrote:

>  I had some free time so I labbed up your scenario using the initial
> configs and had the same issue as you. What you will notice in your “show
> frame-relay map” command is that you have a bunch of mappings to 0.0.0.0.
> The moment you enter “encapsulation frame-relay” on your interface they will
> learn the DLCI’s automatically. The only way to clear these out is to reload
> your router. Once the router is back up you should have a dynamic mapping to
> R2 (150.100.24.2) I just did this and now it looks correct and I can ping :)
>
>
>
> R4(config-if)#do sh frame map | i 150.100.24|broad
>
> Serial0/0 (up): ip 150.100.24.2 dlci 402(0x192,0x6420), dynamic,
>
>               broadcast,, status defined, active
>
>
>
> R4(config-if)#do ping 150.100.24.2
>
> Type escape sequence to abort.
>
> Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 150.100.24.2, timeout is 2 seconds:
>
> !!!!!
>
> Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 4/4/8 ms
>
>
>
> You could also use a static mapping (if you are permitted)
>
>
>
> “frame-relay map ip 150.100.24.2 402 broadcast”
>
>
>
> It sucks that you had to spend so much time troubleshooting an issue you
> thought was with RIP, but had nothing to do with it at all. This is a good
> learning process however, just try and remember to test this prior to
> starting your lab and definitely before running a routing protocol over it!
> In this way you will spend less time troubleshooting the wrong technology
> (e.x. RIP instead of Frame Relay).
>
>
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
>
>
> Steve Di Bias
>
> Network Engineer - Information Systems
>
> *Valley Health System – Las Vegas*
>
> *Office* - 702- 369-7594
>
> *Cell* - 702-241-1801
>
> *[email protected]* <[email protected]>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Nilesh Mehta [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 07, 2010 9:46 AM
>
> *To:* Di Bias, Steve
> *Cc:* [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] WB1 - LAB8 -Task 1-2
>
>
>
> Steve,
>
> Thanks for your prompt reply. I had a same config for interfaces on R2 and
> R4. I did not store output for
>
> *show frame pvc | in ACT*
>
> *show frame map*
>
>  so I will have to do it again. I am not 100% sure but I remember that that
> show frame pvc | in ACTIVE did not show me map for 402 dlci through inverse
> arp but still interface shows up/up.
>
> I will let you know within a day or two . Any other thing do you want me to
> try except frame relay map command on R4 ? I believed that its an issue on
> R4 only as I was able to ping all loop back from R1 to R9 without any
> problem.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Nilesh
>
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Di Bias, Steve <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Looking at the initial configs for lab 8 I’m seeing the following
>
>
>
> R2
>
>
>
> interface Serial0/1/0.24 point-to-point
>
> description Frame Relay Cloud 2
>
> ip address 150.100.24.2 255.255.255.0
>
> frame-relay interface-dlci 204
>
>
>
> R4
>
>
>
> interface Serial0/0/0
>
> ip address 150.100.24.4 255.255.255.0
>
> encapsulation frame-relay
>
> frame-relay lmi-type cisco
>
> no shut
>
>
>
> So you are correct in that it looks like R4 is using inverse-arp
>
>
>
> So please post the output from the commands on R4
>
>
>
> *show frame pvc | in ACT*
>
> *show frame map*
>
> * *
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Di Bias, Steve
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 07, 2010 9:16 AM
> *To:* 'Nilesh Mehta'
>
>
> *Cc:* [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]
>
> *Subject:* RE: [OSL | CCIE_RS] WB1 - LAB8 -Task 1-2
>
>
>
> On both R2 and R4 run the following commands and post the output
>
>
>
> *show frame pvc | in ACT*
>
> *show frame map*
>
> * *
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> Steve
>
>
>
> *From:* Nilesh Mehta [mailto:[email protected]]
>
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 07, 2010 9:12 AM
>
> *To:* Di Bias, Steve
> *Cc:* [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]
>
>
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] WB1 - LAB8 -Task 1-2
>
>
>
> NO even I am not able to ping. but interface shows up/up status.Looks like
> its issue with frame relay interface. By default initial config for lab 8
> does not map frame interface properly and its use inverse ARP by default and
>  we do not have mapping statement for frame interface.
>
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Di Bias, Steve <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Can you ping 150.100.24.4 from R2?
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Nilesh Mehta [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 06, 2010 4:13 PM
> *To:* Di Bias, Steve
> *Cc:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] WB1 - LAB8 -Task 1-2
>
>
>
> All the loopback addresses in routing table  except only R4. I can ping to
> all loopback from R1to R9 but not routes for 200.0.0.4
>
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Di Bias, Steve <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Well you are advertising 200.0.0.0 in RIP so what do you see on R2 when you
> issue the following command
>
>
>
> “show ip route 200.0.0.4”
>
>
>
> Steve
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Nilesh Mehta
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 06, 2010 1:59 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_RS] WB1 - LAB8 -Task 1-2
>
>
>
>
>
> I was trying to setup neighbor adjacency between R2 and R4. I have same
> configuration as per DSG
>
> but I was not able to connect  R4 loop back’s address. R4’s  loop back
> address never appeared  in routing table
>
> (200.0.0.4).I have both up/up status for serial link on both side and  I
>  tried with  no validate source command on R4 and split horizon on R2 but it
> did not work. Not sure what could be problem? Any one has this problem
> earlier ? Please let me know
>
> Thanks--Nilesh
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> R4(config-router)#do sh run | s rip
>
> router rip
>
> version 2
>
> passive-interface default
>
> no passive-interface Serial0/0/0
>
> network 150.100.0.0
>
> network 200.0.0.0
>
> no auto-summary
>
> -----------------------------------
>
>
>
> R2#sh run | s rip
>
> description Ethernet Link to R1
>
> description Frame Relay Links
>
> description Frame Relay Cloud 2
>
> description Frame Relay Cloud 1
>
> description Serial Link to R5
>
> router rip
>
> version 2
>
>  passive-interface default
>
> no passive-interface GigabitEthernet0/0
>
> no passive-interface Serial0/1/0.24
>
> no passive-interface Serial0/1/0.256
>
> no passive-interface Serial0/2/0
>
> network 150.100.0.0
>
> network 200.0.0.0
>
> no auto-summary
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> R4#
>
> *Oct  6 05:55:05.535: RIP: ignored v2 update from bad source 150.100.100.5
> on Serial0/0/0
>
> R4#
>
> *Oct  6 05:55:09.179: RIP: ignored v2 update from bad source 150.100.100.6
> on Serial0/0/0
>
> R4#
>
> *Oct  6 05:55:10.587: RIP: sending v2 update to 224.0.0.9 via Serial0/0/0
> (150.100.24.4)
>
> *Oct  6 05:55:10.587: RIP: build update entries
>
> *Oct  6 05:55:10.587:   150.100.24.0/24 via 0.0.0.0, metric 1, tag 0
>
> *Oct  6 05:55:10.587:   150.100.40.0/24 via 0.0.0.0, metric 1, tag 0
>
> *Oct  6 05:55:10.587:   150.100.41.0/24 via 0.0.0.0, metric 1, tag 0
>
> *Oct  6 05:55:10.587:   200.0.0.4/32 via 0.0.0.0, metric 1, tag 0
>
> R4#
>
> *Oct  6 05:55:35.139: RIP: ignored v2 update from bad source 150.100.100.5
> on Serial0/0/0
>
> R4#
>
> *Oct  6 05:55:36.967: RIP: sending v2 update to 224.0.0.9 via Serial0/0/0
> (150.100.24.4)
>
> *Oct  6 05:55:36.967: RIP: build update entries
>
> *Oct  6 05:55:36.967:   150.100.24.0/24 via 0.0.0.0, metric 1, tag 0
>
> *Oct  6 05:55:36.967:   150.100.40.0/24 via 0.0.0.0, metric 1, tag 0
>
> *Oct  6 05:55:36.967:   150.100.41.0/24 via 0.0.0.0, metric 1, tag 0
>
> *Oct  6 05:55:36.967:   200.0.0.4/32 via 0.0.0.0, metric 1, tag 0
>
> *Oct  6 05:55:37.483: RIP: ignored v2 update from bad source 150.100.100.6
> on Serial0/0/0
>
> R4#
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> R2#
>
> R2#*Oct  6 05:42:08.283: RIP: sending v2 update to 224.0.0.9 via
> Serial0/1/0.24 (150.100.24.2)
>
> *Oct  6 05:42:08.283: RIP: build update entries
>
> *Oct  6 05:42:08.283:   66.0.0.0/8 via 0.0.0.0, metric 12, tag 0
>
> *Oct  6 05:42:08.283:   66.110.173.0/24 via 0.0.0.0, metric 10, tag 0
>
> *Oct  6 05:42:08.283:   66.203.191.0/24 via 0.0.0.0, metric 10, tag 0
>
> *Oct  6 05:42:08.283:   100.0.0.0/8 via 0.0.0.0, metric 4, tag 0
>
> *Oct  6 05:42:08.283:   100.100.100.0/24 via 0.0.0.0, metric 2, tag 0
>
> *Oct  6 05:42:08.283:   150.100.12.0/24 via 0.0.0.0, metric 1, tag 0
>
> *Oct  6 05:42:08.283:   150.100.24.0/24 via 0.0.0.0, metric 1, tag 0
>
> *Oct  6 05:42:08.283:   150.100.25.0/24 via 0.0.0.0, metric 1, tag 0
>
> *Oct  6 05:42:08.283:   150.100.69.0/24 via 0.0.0.0, metric 2, tag 0
>
> *Oct  6 05:42:08.283:   150.100.78.0/24 via 0.0.0.0, metric 3, tag 0
>
> *Oct  6 05:42:08.283:   150.100.81.0/24 via 0.0.0.0, metric 4, tag 0
>
> *Oct  6 05:42:08.283:   150.100.91.0/24 via 0.0.0.0, metric 3, tag 0
>
> *Oct  6 05:42:08.283:   150.100.100.0/24 via 0.0.0.0, metric 1, tag 0
>
> *Oct  6 05:42:08.283:   150.100.220.0/24 via 0.0.0.0, metric 2, tag 0
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments,
> is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
> confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
> disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited, and may be
> punishable by law. If this was sent to you in error, please notify the
> sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments,
> is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
> confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
> disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited, and may be
> punishable by law. If this was sent to you in error, please notify the
> sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments,
> is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
> confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
> disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited, and may be
> punishable by law. If this was sent to you in error, please notify the
> sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
>
>
>
>
>
> UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments,
> is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
> confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
> disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited, and may be
> punishable by law. If this was sent to you in error, please notify the
> sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to