Does anyone know if there is a bug in 12.4(24)T4 that would cause a router to ignor BSR messages when RPF clearly is satisfied?
R5#sh ip rpf 192.0.0.23 RPF information for ? (192.0.0.23) RPF interface: FastEthernet0/1.235 RPF neighbor: ? (192.0.235.23) RPF route/mask: 192.0.0.23/32 RPF type: mbgp RPF recursion count: 0 Doing distance-preferred lookups across tables R5# *Jan 18 17:33:19.255: PIM-BSR(0): bootstrap (192.0.0.23) on non-RPF path FastEthernet0/1.235 or from non-RPF neighbor 192.0.235.23 discarded R5# *Jan 18 17:33:53.791: PIM-BSR(0): Build v2 Candidate-RP advertisement for 192.0.0.52 priority 0, holdtime 150 *Jan 18 17:33:53.791: PIM-BSR(0): Candidate RP's group prefix 224.0.0.0/4 *Jan 18 17:33:53.791: PIM-BSR(0): no bootstrap router address Cisco IOS Software, 2800 Software (C2800NM-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 12.4(24)T4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport Copyright (c) 1986-2010 by Cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Fri 03-Sep-10 05:38 by prod_rel_team If I am missing something......please please tell me. I'm almost out of hair to pull. Patrick A. Baldwin (Alex) Network Engineering Colsa Corp., HOSC Contract NASA , Marshall Space Flight Center *Office: (256) 544-2089 ÊFax: (256) 544-8629 *E-mail: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
