Thanks for your response Jay.

Ref Volume 3 Lab 5-T, Ticket 4

235.23 is the directly connected interface from R5 to BB3, it is the RPF 
neighbor.  I was thinking that the source of the packet would be 192.0.0.23 and 
that is what would need to pass RPF.  Indeed looking at BB3, it does have ip 
pim bsr-candidate Loopback0 0.

Just to be sure, 235.23 also passes RPF check as well.

R5#sh ip rpf 192.0.235.23
RPF information for ? (192.0.235.23)
  RPF interface: FastEthernet0/1.235
  RPF neighbor: ? (192.0.235.23) - directly connected
  RPF route/mask: 192.0.235.0/24
  RPF type: unicast (connected)
  RPF recursion count: 0
  Doing distance-preferred lookups across tables
R5#



Patrick A. Baldwin (Alex)
Network Engineering
Colsa Corp., HOSC Contract
NASA , Marshall Space Flight Center
 Office: (256) 544-2089
Fax: (256) 544-8629   
 E-mail: [email protected]


-----Original Message-----
From: Jay [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 12:42 PM
To: Baldwin, Patrick A.
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IP PIM BSR

Where does 192.0.235.23 come into play? Does it pass the RPF check? Also, is 
both a mapping agent candidate and RP candidate configured?

Sent from my iPad

On Jan 18, 2011, at 12:32 PM, "Baldwin, Patrick A." <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> Does anyone know if there is a bug in 12.4(24)T4 that would cause a router to 
> ignor BSR messages when RPF clearly is satisfied?
> 
> 
> R5#sh ip rpf 192.0.0.23
> RPF information for ? (192.0.0.23)
>  RPF interface: FastEthernet0/1.235
>  RPF neighbor: ? (192.0.235.23)
>  RPF route/mask: 192.0.0.23/32
>  RPF type: mbgp
>  RPF recursion count: 0
>  Doing distance-preferred lookups across tables
> R5#
> *Jan 18 17:33:19.255: PIM-BSR(0): bootstrap (192.0.0.23) on non-RPF path 
> FastEthernet0/1.235 or from non-RPF neighbor 192.0.235.23 discarded
> R5#
> *Jan 18 17:33:53.791: PIM-BSR(0): Build v2 Candidate-RP advertisement for 
> 192.0.0.52 priority 0, holdtime 150
> *Jan 18 17:33:53.791: PIM-BSR(0):  Candidate RP's group prefix 224.0.0.0/4
> *Jan 18 17:33:53.791: PIM-BSR(0): no bootstrap router address
> 
> 
> Cisco IOS Software, 2800 Software (C2800NM-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 
> 12.4(24)T4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
> Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
> Copyright (c) 1986-2010 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
> Compiled Fri 03-Sep-10 05:38 by prod_rel_team
> 
> If I am missing something......please please tell me.  I'm almost out of hair 
> to pull.
> 
> Patrick A. Baldwin (Alex)
> Network Engineering
> Colsa Corp., HOSC Contract
> NASA , Marshall Space Flight Center
> *Office: (256) 544-2089
> ÊFax: (256) 544-8629
> *E-mail: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to