I wouldn't have thought RFC 1149/2549 would be appropriate in the data centre. Those always seemed like WAN technologies to me.
Now, RFC 5841! There's what you should be using in your data centre. On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Max Pierson <[email protected]> wrote: > I never thought reading a RFC could be so .... well funny lol > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Di Bias, Steve <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > Aahhahahah!!!!!! > > > > That's awesome Marko :) > > > > The RFC Frame Format for those who aren't familiar! > > > > Frame Format > > > > The IP datagram is printed, on a small scroll of paper, in > > hexadecimal, with each octet separated by whitestuff and blackstuff. > > The scroll of paper is wrapped around one leg of the avian carrier. > > A band of duct tape is used to secure the datagram's edges. The > > bandwidth is limited to the leg length. The MTU is variable, and > > paradoxically, generally increases with increased carrier age. A > > typical MTU is 256 milligrams. Some datagram padding may be needed. > > > > Upon receipt, the duct tape is removed and the paper copy of the > > datagram is optically scanned into a electronically transmittable > > form. > > > > Thank you, > > > > Steve Di Bias > > Network Engineer - Information Systems > > Valley Health System - Las Vegas > > Office - 702- 369-7594 > > Cell - 702-241-1801 > > [email protected] > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Marko Milivojevic [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 11:42 PM > > To: Di Bias, Steve > > Cc: Johan Bornman; [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] OT: Test > > > > It looks like using RFC 1149 in our data center wasn't effective. > > > > We're working on identifying the issue. > > > > > > -- > > Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 > > Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert > > > > Free CCIE Training: http://bit.ly/vLecture > > > > Mailto: [email protected] > > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 > > Community: http://www.ipexpert.com/communities > > > > :: Sent from my phone. Apologies for errors and brevity. :: > > > > On Jan 27, 2011, at 6:57, "Di Bias, Steve" <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > That's about the time I noticed it too. Waiting for a response from the > > powers that be, hopefully it will get resolved soon > > > > > > Johan Bornman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I am having the same delay, it's been like that for a weeks now I > think. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [email protected] > > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Di Bias, > Steve > > > Sent: 27 January 2011 02:24 AM > > > To: Di Bias, Steve; [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] OT: Test > > > > > > I sent this at 3:03 but it didn't come back to me until 4:23, is anyone > > else > > > noticing this issue or is it on my end?? > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [email protected] > > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Di Bias, > Steve > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 3:03 PM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] OT: Test > > > > > > Please disregard, I'm just testing the amount of time this comes back > > into > > > my inbox, seems my OSL responses are taking 2 to 4 hours to post. Not > > sure > > > why? > > > > > > > > > > > > UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any > > attachments, > > > is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain > > > confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, > > > disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If this > > was > > > sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and > > destroy > > > all copies of the original message. > > > _______________________________________________ > > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > please > > > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > > > > > > > UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any > > attachments, > > > is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain > > > confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, > > > disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If this > > was > > > sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and > > destroy > > > all copies of the original message. > > > _______________________________________________ > > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > please > > > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > > > > > > > > > > UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any > > attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may > > contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized > review, > > use, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If > this > > was sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and > > destroy all copies of the original message. > > > _______________________________________________ > > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > please > > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > > > > UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any > > attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may > > contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized > review, > > use, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If > this > > was sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and > > destroy all copies of the original message. > > _______________________________________________ > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
