There's a lot of them there... Look at the ones dated 1st April and Christmas Eve.
Sent from my iPad On 28 Jan 2011, at 04:47, Max Pierson <[email protected]> wrote: > I never thought reading a RFC could be so .... well funny lol > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Di Bias, Steve > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Aahhahahah!!!!!! >> >> That's awesome Marko :) >> >> The RFC Frame Format for those who aren't familiar! >> >> Frame Format >> >> The IP datagram is printed, on a small scroll of paper, in >> hexadecimal, with each octet separated by whitestuff and blackstuff. >> The scroll of paper is wrapped around one leg of the avian carrier. >> A band of duct tape is used to secure the datagram's edges. The >> bandwidth is limited to the leg length. The MTU is variable, and >> paradoxically, generally increases with increased carrier age. A >> typical MTU is 256 milligrams. Some datagram padding may be needed. >> >> Upon receipt, the duct tape is removed and the paper copy of the >> datagram is optically scanned into a electronically transmittable >> form. >> >> Thank you, >> >> Steve Di Bias >> Network Engineer - Information Systems >> Valley Health System - Las Vegas >> Office - 702- 369-7594 >> Cell - 702-241-1801 >> [email protected] >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Marko Milivojevic [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 11:42 PM >> To: Di Bias, Steve >> Cc: Johan Bornman; [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] OT: Test >> >> It looks like using RFC 1149 in our data center wasn't effective. >> >> We're working on identifying the issue. >> >> >> -- >> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 >> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert >> >> Free CCIE Training: http://bit.ly/vLecture >> >> Mailto: [email protected] >> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 >> Community: http://www.ipexpert.com/communities >> >> :: Sent from my phone. Apologies for errors and brevity. :: >> >> On Jan 27, 2011, at 6:57, "Di Bias, Steve" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> That's about the time I noticed it too. Waiting for a response from the >> powers that be, hopefully it will get resolved soon >>> >>> Johan Bornman <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> I am having the same delay, it's been like that for a weeks now I think. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [email protected] >>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Di Bias, Steve >>> Sent: 27 January 2011 02:24 AM >>> To: Di Bias, Steve; [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] OT: Test >>> >>> I sent this at 3:03 but it didn't come back to me until 4:23, is anyone >> else >>> noticing this issue or is it on my end?? >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [email protected] >>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Di Bias, Steve >>> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 3:03 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] OT: Test >>> >>> Please disregard, I'm just testing the amount of time this comes back >> into >>> my inbox, seems my OSL responses are taking 2 to 4 hours to post. Not >> sure >>> why? >>> >>> >>> >>> UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any >> attachments, >>> is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain >>> confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, >>> disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If this >> was >>> sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and >> destroy >>> all copies of the original message. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>> >>> >>> UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any >> attachments, >>> is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain >>> confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, >>> disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If this >> was >>> sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and >> destroy >>> all copies of the original message. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>> >>> >>> >>> UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any >> attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may >> contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, >> use, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If this >> was sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and >> destroy all copies of the original message. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> >> UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any >> attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may >> contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, >> use, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If this >> was sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and >> destroy all copies of the original message. >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
