I never thought reading a RFC could be so .... well funny lol On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Di Bias, Steve <[email protected]>wrote:
> Aahhahahah!!!!!! > > That's awesome Marko :) > > The RFC Frame Format for those who aren't familiar! > > Frame Format > > The IP datagram is printed, on a small scroll of paper, in > hexadecimal, with each octet separated by whitestuff and blackstuff. > The scroll of paper is wrapped around one leg of the avian carrier. > A band of duct tape is used to secure the datagram's edges. The > bandwidth is limited to the leg length. The MTU is variable, and > paradoxically, generally increases with increased carrier age. A > typical MTU is 256 milligrams. Some datagram padding may be needed. > > Upon receipt, the duct tape is removed and the paper copy of the > datagram is optically scanned into a electronically transmittable > form. > > Thank you, > > Steve Di Bias > Network Engineer - Information Systems > Valley Health System - Las Vegas > Office - 702- 369-7594 > Cell - 702-241-1801 > [email protected] > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Marko Milivojevic [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 11:42 PM > To: Di Bias, Steve > Cc: Johan Bornman; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] OT: Test > > It looks like using RFC 1149 in our data center wasn't effective. > > We're working on identifying the issue. > > > -- > Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 > Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert > > Free CCIE Training: http://bit.ly/vLecture > > Mailto: [email protected] > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 > Community: http://www.ipexpert.com/communities > > :: Sent from my phone. Apologies for errors and brevity. :: > > On Jan 27, 2011, at 6:57, "Di Bias, Steve" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > That's about the time I noticed it too. Waiting for a response from the > powers that be, hopefully it will get resolved soon > > > > Johan Bornman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I am having the same delay, it's been like that for a weeks now I think. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Di Bias, Steve > > Sent: 27 January 2011 02:24 AM > > To: Di Bias, Steve; [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] OT: Test > > > > I sent this at 3:03 but it didn't come back to me until 4:23, is anyone > else > > noticing this issue or is it on my end?? > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Di Bias, Steve > > Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 3:03 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] OT: Test > > > > Please disregard, I'm just testing the amount of time this comes back > into > > my inbox, seems my OSL responses are taking 2 to 4 hours to post. Not > sure > > why? > > > > > > > > UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any > attachments, > > is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain > > confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, > > disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If this > was > > sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and > destroy > > all copies of the original message. > > _______________________________________________ > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > > > > UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any > attachments, > > is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain > > confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, > > disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If this > was > > sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and > destroy > > all copies of the original message. > > _______________________________________________ > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > > > > > > UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any > attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may > contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, > use, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If this > was sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and > destroy all copies of the original message. > > _______________________________________________ > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any > attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may > contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, > use, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If this > was sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and > destroy all copies of the original message. > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
