Default OSL answer - Does it meet the task requirements?

Sounds like there are 2 methods to do what is required. 1 method is
restricted on 1 particular interface. To me that doesn't restrict you from
using the unrestricted method on both interfaces.


On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Jason Maynard <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hey OSL
>
>
> Any comments?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jason Maynard
> Sent: February-27-11 11:41 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol1-Lab21.2
>
> Quick question
>
>
>
> -          Configure traffic shaping for all traffic other than H.323 voice
> destined for 200.0.0.4
>
> -          Equal-cost paths to 200.0.0.4
>
> -          Make sure traffic-shaping is enabled on both interfaces
>
> -          Bit rate allowed is 7Mbps (no excess-burst)
>
> -          Path through f0/0 do not use traffic-shape
>
> -          You may use 1 class-map but no “match protocol” or  “match
> access-group” specifically
>
>
>
> The DSG showed a solution using traffic-shape (f0/1) and MQC (f0/0
>
>
>
> My solution is with MQC since it did not state that I had to use
> traffic-shape command on either interface
>
>
>
> class-map match-all 21.2
>
> match not protocol h323
>
> match not access-group 100
>
> policy-map P-21.2
>
> class 21.2
>
>    shape average 7000000 28000 0 ß How I got the 28000 was a warning comes
> up from IOS stating “shape average 700000 ?
>
>  WORD  bits per interval, sustained. Recommend not to configure it, the
>
>        algorithm will find out the best value .
>
>
>
> I let IOS perform the calculation applied the policy-map, did a “show
> policy-map interfas0/0”  and saw that IOS picked “7000000 28000 28000”,
> since there is a requirement not to have BE I edited the shape average to
> “7000000 28000 0”
>
>
>
> access-list 100 permit ip any host 200.0.0.4
>
>
>
> interface FastEthernet0/0
>
> ip address 150.100.220.7 255.255.255.0
>
> duplex auto
>
> speed auto
>
> service-policy output P-21.2
>
>
>
> interface FastEthernet0/1
>
> ip address 150.100.221.7 255.255.255.0
>
> duplex auto
>
> speed auto
>
> service-policy output P-21.2
>
>
>
> do sh policy-map inter fas 0/0
>
> FastEthernet0/0
>
>
>
>  Service-policy output: P-21.2
>
>
>
>    Class-map: 21.2 (match-all)
>
>      196 packets, 21969 bytes
>
>      5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
>
>      Match: not protocol h323
>
>      Match: not access-group 100
>
>      Queueing
>
>      queue limit 64 packets
>
>      (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
>
>      (pkts output/bytes output) 196/20045
>
>      shape (average) cir 7000000, bc 28000, be 0
>
>      target shape rate 7000000
>
>
>
>    Class-map: class-default (match-any)
>
>      0 packets, 0 bytes
>
>      5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
>
>      Match: any
>
>
>
>      queue limit 64 packets
>
>      (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
>
>      (pkts output/bytes output) 0/0
>
>
>
>
>
> do sh policy-map inter fas 0/1
>
> FastEthernet0/1
>
>
>
>  Service-policy output: P-21.2
>
>
>
>    Class-map: 21.2 (match-all)
>
>      157 packets, 15134 bytes
>
>      5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
>
>      Match: not protocol h323
>
>      Match: not access-group 100
>
>      Queueing
>
>      queue limit 64 packets
>
>      (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
>
>      (pkts output/bytes output) 157/15765
>
>      shape (average) cir 7000000, bc 28000, be 0
>
>      target shape rate 7000000
>
>
>
>    Class-map: class-default (match-any)
>
>      0 packets, 0 bytes
>
>      5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
>
>      Match: any
>
>
>
>      queue limit 64 packets
>
>      (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
>
>      (pkts output/bytes output) 0/0
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Let me know if you believe I would have got the points and all feedback is
> appreciated (Please include ways that you would have answered the question
> and explain why you went in the direction you did)
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Jason
>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to