I do not have the task in front of me, but could it be that there was no need for granularity? It is just a quicker way of saying all IPV6.
Also, another guess is the fact that there might not have been IPv6 ACLs available in the IOS code at the time! :) -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alef Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 7:38 AM To: [email protected] IE Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] vol1 task 21.5 no acl needed for ipv6 in priority queue? I noticed that with the priority queues, that ipv6 is not bound to a acl of permit any any? i.e. for all other traffic, the command is set as : priority-list 1 protocol ip low list 102 but ipv6 is done as: priority-list 1 protocol ipv6 normal with no acl? any clues ? _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
