Yeah i think you're right. Thanks Jay. On Jun 15, 2011, at 6:17 PM, Jay Taylor wrote:
> If I had to guess I'd say they were just demonstrating 2 ways of > accomplishing similar tasks. > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Aaron Moreck <[email protected]> wrote: > Alef, > > If you dont specifiy an ACL then all ipv6 traffic is matched. > > you can do the same thing for IPv4 > > Aaron > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 7:38 AM, Alef <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I noticed that with the priority queues, that ipv6 is not bound to a acl of > > permit any any? i.e. for all other traffic, the command is set as : > > priority-list 1 protocol ip low list 102 > > > > but ipv6 is done as: > > priority-list 1 protocol ipv6 normal > > > > with no acl? > > > > any clues ? > > _______________________________________________ > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > > www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> > > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > > > -- > > Jay Taylor > CCIE #28391 > @JTIE_6EE7 > > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
