On Jun 21, 2011, at 11:58 PM, Marko Milivojevic wrote: >> Right we use these for normal subnets, but for wildcard masks the values are >> minus 1 correct? > > No - those are bit values, always.
Right ok. That would make more sense. So why do people refer to those -1 values at times when talking about wildcard masks. > >> So you're saying AutoRP doesn't support non contiguous wildcard masks? That >> seems odd, why does it >> support the wildcard mask in the first place then ? > > Wildcard masks are functionality of ACLs. Discontiguous wildcard masks > are supported elsewhere. I thought wildcard masks are discontiguous by nature and as such should be supported all that allow them ? > >> What about just 228.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 and 230.0.0.0 0.255.255.255, this >> seems redundant ?(no offense) > > Well, do you want /7 or /8 - make up your mind :-) I want /7, i just don't want them twice :-) > > Again - wildcard masks are not inverted netmasks... :-) Yeah i was just wondering where those minus one values came from, that's what set me off. Regards, Alef > > -- > Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 > Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert > > FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture > > Mailto: [email protected] > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 > Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/ _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
