I believe I set the virtual-template interface with two peer commands Not in front of a router so I forget the exact syntax
I think it was "peer default ip dhcp" and "peer default ip pool xxx" One to set the method to dhcp and the other to specify the pool to use On Sunday, August 7, 2011, Cedric King <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm receiving the following error on R6 when i do a deb pppoe event and packet : > > *Aug 7 19:37:54.787: PPPoE : encap string prepared > *Aug 7 19:37:54.787: [101]PPPoE 101: Access IE handle allocated > *Aug 7 19:37:54.787: [101]PPPoE 101: pppoe SSS switch updated > *Aug 7 19:37:54.787: [101]PPPoE 101: AAA unique ID allocated > *Aug 7 19:37:54.787: PPPoE 0: O PADS R:0026.99d0.34f8 L:001e.4aee.c1f8 Fa0/0 > 00 26 99 D0 34 F8 00 1E 4A EE C1 F8 88 63 11 65 > 00 00 00 48 01 03 00 04 49 CA D5 04 01 02 00 02 ... > *Aug 7 19:37:54.787: [101]PPPoE 101: Destroying R:0026.99d0.34f8 L:001e.4aee.c1f8 Fa0/0 > *Aug 7 19:37:54.787: [101]PPPoE 101: AAA account stopped > > and on R7 the following error : > > *Aug 7 20:01:15.319: IP: s=0.0.0.0 (local), d=255.255.255.255 (Dialer1), len 604, encapsulation failed > *Aug 7 20:01:19.319: IP: s=0.0.0.0 (local), d=255.255.255.255 (Dialer1), len 604, sending broad/multicast > *Aug 7 20:01:19.319: IP: s=0.0.0.0 (local), d=255.255.255.255 (Dialer1), len 604, output feature, Dialer idle reset(66), rtype 0, forus FALSE, sendself FALSE, mtu 0, fwdchk FALSE > *Aug 7 20:01:19.319: IP: s=0.0.0.0 (local), d=255.255.255.255 (Dialer1), len 604, encapsulation failed > > > I've checked the vlan information.. and when i remove the pppoe setup apply the ip addresses to the interface, they ping each other... I'm researching this issue and its not really documented well.. > > That was my thought to, but I just enabled DHCP snooping on Cat2 for this VLAN, shutdown my dialer interface on R7, no shut it and still pulled an IP without trusting port F0/6 on Cat2 > > Cat3560-2(config)#ip dhcp snooping > Cat3560-2(config)#ip dhcp snooping vlan 567 > > R7(config)#int dialer 1 > R7(config-if)#shut > > *Jul 7 14:33:19.785: %DIALER-6-UNBIND: Interface Vi2 unbound from profile Di1 > *Jul 7 14:33:19.789: Di1 DDR: dialer shutdown complete > *Jul 7 14:33:19.793: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Virtual-Access2, changed state to down > *Jul 7 14:33:19.797: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console > *Jul 7 14:33:20.793: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Virtual-Access2, changed state to down > > R7(config)#int dialer 1 > R7(config-if)#no shut > > Jul 7 14:34:13.833: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Dialer1, changed state to up > *Jul 7 14:34:22.265: %DIALER-6-BIND: Interface Vi2 bound to profile Di1 > *Jul 7 14:34:22.269: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Virtual-Access2, changed state to up > *Jul 7 14:34:23.273: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Virtual-Access2, changed state to up > *Jul 7 14:30:10.521: %DHCP-6-ADDRESS_ASSIGN: Interface Dialer1 assigned DHCP address 141.41.67.2, mask 255.255.255.0, hostname R7 > > Cat3560-2(config-if)#int gig0/6 > Cat3560-2(config-if)#ip dhcp snooping trust > > Cat3560-2(config-if)#do sh ip dhcp snoop | b Trusted > Interface Trusted Rate limit (pps) > ------------------------ ------- ---------------- > GigabitEthernet0/6 yes unlimited > > Now when I shut/no shut the interface I still get an IP address > > *Jul 7 14:39:01.157: %DHCP-6-ADDRESS_ASSIGN: Interface Dialer1 assigned DHCP address 141.41.67.4, mask 255.255.255.0, hostname R7 > > So it doesn't seem to care either way from what I can tell. > > His configs looks good with the exception of the bba-group command which has "interface" listed (which wont work) > > bba-group pppoe global > virtual-template 1 > > Thank you, > > Steve E. Di Bias > Network Engineer - Information Systems > Valley Health System - Las Vegas > Office - 702- 369-7594 > Cell - 702-241-1801 > [email protected] > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto: [email protected]] On Behalf Of Jason Maynard > Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2011 10:54 PM > To: 'Cedric King'; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] L1v3task 2-4 > > Off the top of my head - Did you trust the DHCP server that I is connected > to the switch? Or did you reload the routers? > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Cedric King > Sent: August-06-11 11:19 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] L1v3task 2-4 > > I've been working on Task 2-4 Lab 1 workbook 3 for about two hours now and > can not get the pppoe to come up between R6 - 7.. I have the following > config a applied: > > r6 > ------ > > bba-group pppoe group global > interface virtual-temp 1 > > int virtual-temp 1 > encap ppp > ip addr x.x.67.6 255.255.255.0 > ip mtu 1492 > > > ip dhcp exclude-addr x.x.67.1 x.x.67.6 > ip dhcp exclude-addr x.x.67.8 x.x.67.255 > > ip dhcp pool R67 > network x.x.67.0 /24 > > int fa0/0 > no ip addr > pppoe enable group global > > R7 > ---- > > int fa0/0 > no ip addr > pppoe-client dial-pool-number 1 > > > int dialer 1 > encap ppp > ip mtu 1492 > ip addr dhcp > dialer pool 1 > > > I've been through the solution guide and i've watched the video work book > and have followed each step.. and its not working.. I've verified the > physical set _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
