yep, we seriously considered it as well (for vmware reasons). ended up swapping to a different style dc intercponnect and just have a real .1q between them (filtered out spanning tree and did l2 only for the vmware segments).
Sent from an email server. On Feb 5, 2012, at 12:59 PM, Thomas Raabo - Zitcom A/S <[email protected]> wrote: > Sad but true... > > We live in a VMware world ;) > > Med venlig hilsen | Best regards > Thomas Raabo > Senior Network Engineer CCIE #33466 > > > > _____________________________________________ > [email protected] | Direkte: +45 69 10 60 18 | Tlf.: +45 70 23 55 66 > > > -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- > Fra: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] På vegne af Marko Milivojevic > Sendt: 5. februar 2012 18:22 > Til: CCIE KID > Cc: CCIE OSL > Emne: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Pseudowire > > Actually, I've seen L2VPNs (pseudowires) deployed by the enterprises as a way > to interconnect data centers :-) > > -- > Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S) Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert > > On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 08:38, CCIE KID <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Tim >> >> i dont see any Enterprise Routing and Switching Environment use Psuedowires. >> Pseudowires is a primary component in SP side. its all about carrying >> ur Acesss layer traffic from ur secondary ISP to ur Primary ISP. >> >> Secondary ISP is customer of Primary ISP. So they use a Pseudowire >> from a Secondary ISP PE to Primary ISP PE. >> >> Pseudowire is nothing but a Point to Point Virtual Circuit use to >> emulate a Physical Pipe or a directly connected link which costs much >> >> If u r really excited about this technology, then go for SP which is >> absolutely brute for Network Engineers. >> >> >> >> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Anthony Sequeira >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> http://blog.ipexpert.com/2012/01/05/ccie-rs-4-0-expanded-blueprint-fo >>> r-mpls/ >>> >>> If anyone has suggestions/edits for this document - I would love to >>> hear it. >>> >>> On Feb 4, 2012, at 1:40 PM, Marko Milivojevic wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 14:07, Tim Miller <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Is AToM worth going over for R&S? I can't tell if it's on the >>>>> Blueprint. >>>> >>>> I wouldn't be wasting time on it. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S) Senior CCIE Instructor - >>>> IPexpert _______________________________________________ >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>>> >>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>> >>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>> >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>> >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >> >> >> >> >> -- >> With Warmest Regards, >> >> CCIE KID >> CCIE#29992 (Security) >> >> > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
