Same here.
Johan Bornman Integrated Systems Consulting (Pty) Ltd Cell: 082 783 3635 On 18 May 2012, at 16:03, Jason Maynard <[email protected]> wrote: > I started reading it but soon realized it was a waste of time. > > On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Matt Hill <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I don't know this guy. What I do know is he posts a lot of 5h17 about how >> every CCIE in the world is a cheat and yet he has taken about 18 attempts >> and got nowhere. He can GGF as far as I'm concerned. >> >> Cheers, >> Matt >> >> CCIE #22386 >> CCSI #31207 >> >> On Friday, 18 May 2012, Thomas Raabo - Zitcom A/S wrote: >> >>> Even mr Cisco Russ White is no more. >>> >>> Thomas >>> >>> -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- >>> Fra: [email protected] <javascript:;> [mailto: >>> [email protected] <javascript:;>] På vegne af Ken Wyan >>> Sendt: 18. maj 2012 07:18 >>> Til: [email protected] <javascript:;> >>> Emne: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIE how to pass the lab (light humour) >>> >>> Thanks for sharing. >>> >>> This is more or less what's hapenning everywhere. These type of marketing >>> guys dominate cisco also & those with good practical experience slowly >> quit >>> due to these jokers. >>> >>> Finally , Cisco products are full of defects. Smallest bugs remain >>> unresolved for a series of releases. >>> >>> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 7:55 AM, Tony Singh <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>>> This article is good humour, enjoy >>>> >>>> http://ccieflyer.com/2010-02-Darby-Weaver-Achilles-Heel.php >>>> >>>> BR >>>> >>>> Tony >>>> >>>> CCNP CCNA R&S JNCIS-SEC MCSE >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone on 3 >>>> >>>> On 17 May 2012, at 17:00, [email protected] wrote: >>>> >>>>> Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >>>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> You can reach the person managing the list at >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >>>>> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..." >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Today's Topics: >>>>> >>>>> 1. Re: ? (Adam Booth) >>>>> 2. Re: Interworking in L2VPN (CCIE KID) >>>>> 3. WB-1 LAB-17 TASK-17.3 (Ren? Huet) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> Message: 1 >>>>> Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 06:46:35 +1000 >>>>> From: Adam Booth <[email protected]> >>>>> To: "Bodnar, Edward" <[email protected]> >>>>> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>>>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] ? >>>>> Message-ID: >>>>> >>>>> <CAKXsBmpn4KoO45ybp-3=pd31hmpsext-bw28_h1ck2l5ltc...@mail.gmail.com> >>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >>>>> >>>>> Hi Edward, >>>>> >>>>> The Switch adds these via option 82 to the DHCP packet made by a >>>>> DHCP client, so the DHCP server can make some decisions as to what >>>>> to do with that user. Generally Circuit-Id is used to identify the >>>>> originating >>>> switch >>>>> and switch port that the customer is connected to, and the remote-id >>>>> may >>>> be >>>>> a service id/customer id. >>>>> >>>>> Depending on your context you could use the Circuit-Id/Remote-Id to >>>> always >>>>> allocate a specific IP address to a Switch port regardless as to >>>>> what the mac address of the client device is. >>>>> >>>>> In a situation where the network infrastructure owner is different >>>>> to the service owner (e.g. a wholesale environment) the >>>>> infrastructure owner may move ports associated with a customer >>>>> around - so the wholesale operator >>>> in >>>>> a lot of instances is told to rely on using the remote-id and not >>>>> the circuit-id to identify their client (but knowing the circuit-id >>>>> may be useful if there is a fault) >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Adam >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:25 AM, Bodnar, Edward < >>>>> ------+---------------------------------+--+--- >>>>>> ----+-- >>>>>> UP ac Gi0/3.99:99(Eth VLAN) UP mpls 62.215.0.194:133 UP >>>>>> >>>>>> PE2#sh xconnect peer 62.215.0.194 all detail Core network division >>>>>> Xconnect test >>>>>> Distribution: Confidential Page 5 >>>>>> Legend: XC ST=Xconnect State S1=Segment1 State S2=Segment2 State >>>>>> UP=Up DN=Down AD=Admin Down IA=Inactive SB=Standby RV=Recovering >>>>>> NH=No Hardware XC ST Segment 1 S1 Segment 2 >>>>>> S2 >>>>>> >>>> ------+---------------------------------+--+-------------------------- >>>> ------+---------------------------------+--+--- >>>>>> ----+-- >>>>>> UP ac Gi0/3.99:99(Eth VLAN) UP mpls 62.215.0.194:133 UP >>>>>> Interworking: ip Local VC label 276 Remote VC label 3090 >>>>>> pw-class: inter-ether >>>>>> >>>>>> TEC-TEST#sh mpls l2transport binding 133 Destination Address: >>>>>> 62.215.0.194, VC ID: 133 Local Label: 276 >>>>>> Cbit: 1, VC Type: IP, GroupID: 0 >>>>>> MTU: 4470, Interface Desc: n/a >>>>>> VCCV: CC Type: CW [1], RA [2] >>>>>> CV Type: LSPV [2] >>>>>> Remote Label: 3090 >>>>>> Cbit: 1, VC Type: IP, GroupID: 0 >>>>>> MTU: 4470, Interface Desc: n/a >>>>>> VCCV: CC Type: RA [2] >>>>>> CV Type: LSPV [2] >>>>>> TEC-TEST#sh mpls l2transport vc 133 detail Local interface: >>>>>> Gi0/3.99 up, line protocol up, Eth VLAN 99 up MPLS VC type is Eth >>>>>> VLAN, interworking type is IP Destination address: 62.215.0.194, VC >>>>>> ID: 133, VC status: up Output interface: Gi0/1, imposed label stack >>>>>> {3090} Preferred path: not configured Default path: active Next >>>>>> hop: 62.215.0.49 Create time: 03:55:11, last status change time: >>>>>> 03:55:11 Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 62.215.0.194:0 up Targeted >>>>>> Hello: 62.215.0.222(LDP Id) -> 62.215.0.194 Status TLV support >>>>>> (local/remote) : enabled/supported Label/status state machine : >>>>>> established, LruRru Last local dataplane status rcvd: no fault Last >>>>>> local SSS circuit status rcvd: no fault Last local SSS circuit >>>>>> status sent: no fault Last local LDP TLV status sent: no fault Last >>>>>> remote LDP TLV status rcvd: no fault MPLS VC labels: local 276, >>>>>> remote 3090 Group ID: local 0, remote 0 >>>>>> MTU: local 4470, remote 4470 >>>>>> Remote interface description: >>>>>> Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled VC statistics: >>>>>> packet totals: receive 1034, send 1034 byte totals: receive >>>>>> 1066540, send 1089288 packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0 >>>>>> Core network division Xconnect test >>>>>> Distribution: Confidential Page 6 >>>>>> PING >>>>>> TESTING2#ping 172.16.18.98 repeat 1000 size 1500 Type escape >>>>>> sequence to abort. >>>>>> Sending 1000, 1500-byte ICMP Echos to 172.16.18.98, timeout is 2 >>>> seconds: >>>>>> >> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>>>> >> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>>>> >> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>>>> >> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>>>> >> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>>>> >> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>>>> >> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>>>> >> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>>>> >> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>>>> >> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>>>> >> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>>>> >> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>>>> >> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>>>> >> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>>>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>>>> Success rate is 100 percent (1000/1000), round-trip min/avg/max = >>>>>> 40/43/60 ms >>>>>> >>>>>> BR, >>>>>> Mohammad >>>>>> >>>>>>> Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 14:53:17 +0530 >>>>>>> Subject: Interworking in L2VPN >>>>>>> From: [email protected] >>>>>>> To: [email protected]; [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi all >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have> >>> _____ Subscription information may be found at: >>>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> With Warmest Regards, >>>>> >>>>> CCIE KID >>>>> CCIE#29992 (Security) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> Message: 3 >>>>> Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 09:53:08 +0200 >>>>> From: Ren? Huet <[email protected] <javascript:;>> >>>>> To: [email protected] <javascript:;> >>>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] WB-1 LAB-17 TASK-17.3 >>>>> Message-ID: >>>>> >>>>> <CADFAz+6e2xs2+a-=5E=6eJTxKM7nMUdxkyezaSyfQLkeSxVz=w...@mail.gmail.com >> <javascript:;> >>>> >>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >>>>> >>>>> Dear all, >>>>> >>>>> For the WB-1 LAB-17 TASK-17.3 >>>>> >>>>> Why we don't deny any 150.100.78.8 >>>>> what is the difference between deny any 150.100.78.8 or Network >>> address? >>>>> >>>>> Normally if I deny any 150.100.78.8 (NVI) is ok no ? >>>>> >>>>> If anyone has an explanation I'm interested >>>>> >>>>> Best regards >>>>> >>>>> Ren? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> End of CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 76, Issue 48 >>>>> *************************************** >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>>> >>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >>>> >>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>> >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>> >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>> >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>> >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >> > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
