Hmm. I didn't get GGF and 5h17 on my recent lab. Maybe I'm not qualified? ;)
Yes, to your points. Regards, Jay McMickle- CCIE #35355 (R&S) Sent from iJay On May 18, 2012, at 8:02 AM, Matt Hill <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't know this guy. What I do know is he posts a lot of 5h17 about how > every CCIE in the world is a cheat and yet he has taken about 18 attempts > and got nowhere. He can GGF as far as I'm concerned. > > Cheers, > Matt > > CCIE #22386 > CCSI #31207 > > On Friday, 18 May 2012, Thomas Raabo - Zitcom A/S wrote: > >> Even mr Cisco Russ White is no more. >> >> Thomas >> >> -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- >> Fra: [email protected] <javascript:;> [mailto: >> [email protected] <javascript:;>] På vegne af Ken Wyan >> Sendt: 18. maj 2012 07:18 >> Til: [email protected] <javascript:;> >> Emne: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIE how to pass the lab (light humour) >> >> Thanks for sharing. >> >> This is more or less what's hapenning everywhere. These type of marketing >> guys dominate cisco also & those with good practical experience slowly quit >> due to these jokers. >> >> Finally , Cisco products are full of defects. Smallest bugs remain >> unresolved for a series of releases. >> >> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 7:55 AM, Tony Singh <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> This article is good humour, enjoy >>> >>> http://ccieflyer.com/2010-02-Darby-Weaver-Achilles-Heel.php >>> >>> BR >>> >>> Tony >>> >>> CCNP CCNA R&S JNCIS-SEC MCSE >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone on 3 >>> >>> On 17 May 2012, at 17:00, [email protected] wrote: >>> >>>> Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>>> You can reach the person managing the list at >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >>>> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..." >>>> >>>> >>>> Today's Topics: >>>> >>>> 1. Re: ? (Adam Booth) >>>> 2. Re: Interworking in L2VPN (CCIE KID) >>>> 3. WB-1 LAB-17 TASK-17.3 (Ren? Huet) >>>> >>>> >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Message: 1 >>>> Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 06:46:35 +1000 >>>> From: Adam Booth <[email protected]> >>>> To: "Bodnar, Edward" <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] ? >>>> Message-ID: >>>> >>>> <CAKXsBmpn4KoO45ybp-3=pd31hmpsext-bw28_h1ck2l5ltc...@mail.gmail.com> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >>>> >>>> Hi Edward, >>>> >>>> The Switch adds these via option 82 to the DHCP packet made by a >>>> DHCP client, so the DHCP server can make some decisions as to what >>>> to do with that user. Generally Circuit-Id is used to identify the >>>> originating >>> switch >>>> and switch port that the customer is connected to, and the remote-id >>>> may >>> be >>>> a service id/customer id. >>>> >>>> Depending on your context you could use the Circuit-Id/Remote-Id to >>> always >>>> allocate a specific IP address to a Switch port regardless as to >>>> what the mac address of the client device is. >>>> >>>> In a situation where the network infrastructure owner is different >>>> to the service owner (e.g. a wholesale environment) the >>>> infrastructure owner may move ports associated with a customer >>>> around - so the wholesale operator >>> in >>>> a lot of instances is told to rely on using the remote-id and not >>>> the circuit-id to identify their client (but knowing the circuit-id >>>> may be useful if there is a fault) >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Adam >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:25 AM, Bodnar, Edward < >>>> ------+---------------------------------+--+--- >>>>> ----+-- >>>>> UP ac Gi0/3.99:99(Eth VLAN) UP mpls 62.215.0.194:133 UP >>>>> >>>>> PE2#sh xconnect peer 62.215.0.194 all detail Core network division >>>>> Xconnect test >>>>> Distribution: Confidential Page 5 >>>>> Legend: XC ST=Xconnect State S1=Segment1 State S2=Segment2 State >>>>> UP=Up DN=Down AD=Admin Down IA=Inactive SB=Standby RV=Recovering >>>>> NH=No Hardware XC ST Segment 1 S1 Segment 2 >>>>> S2 >>>>> >>> ------+---------------------------------+--+-------------------------- >>> ------+---------------------------------+--+--- >>>>> ----+-- >>>>> UP ac Gi0/3.99:99(Eth VLAN) UP mpls 62.215.0.194:133 UP >>>>> Interworking: ip Local VC label 276 Remote VC label 3090 >>>>> pw-class: inter-ether >>>>> >>>>> TEC-TEST#sh mpls l2transport binding 133 Destination Address: >>>>> 62.215.0.194, VC ID: 133 Local Label: 276 >>>>> Cbit: 1, VC Type: IP, GroupID: 0 >>>>> MTU: 4470, Interface Desc: n/a >>>>> VCCV: CC Type: CW [1], RA [2] >>>>> CV Type: LSPV [2] >>>>> Remote Label: 3090 >>>>> Cbit: 1, VC Type: IP, GroupID: 0 >>>>> MTU: 4470, Interface Desc: n/a >>>>> VCCV: CC Type: RA [2] >>>>> CV Type: LSPV [2] >>>>> TEC-TEST#sh mpls l2transport vc 133 detail Local interface: >>>>> Gi0/3.99 up, line protocol up, Eth VLAN 99 up MPLS VC type is Eth >>>>> VLAN, interworking type is IP Destination address: 62.215.0.194, VC >>>>> ID: 133, VC status: up Output interface: Gi0/1, imposed label stack >>>>> {3090} Preferred path: not configured Default path: active Next >>>>> hop: 62.215.0.49 Create time: 03:55:11, last status change time: >>>>> 03:55:11 Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 62.215.0.194:0 up Targeted >>>>> Hello: 62.215.0.222(LDP Id) -> 62.215.0.194 Status TLV support >>>>> (local/remote) : enabled/supported Label/status state machine : >>>>> established, LruRru Last local dataplane status rcvd: no fault Last >>>>> local SSS circuit status rcvd: no fault Last local SSS circuit >>>>> status sent: no fault Last local LDP TLV status sent: no fault Last >>>>> remote LDP TLV status rcvd: no fault MPLS VC labels: local 276, >>>>> remote 3090 Group ID: local 0, remote 0 >>>>> MTU: local 4470, remote 4470 >>>>> Remote interface description: >>>>> Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled VC statistics: >>>>> packet totals: receive 1034, send 1034 byte totals: receive >>>>> 1066540, send 1089288 packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0 >>>>> Core network division Xconnect test >>>>> Distribution: Confidential Page 6 >>>>> PING >>>>> TESTING2#ping 172.16.18.98 repeat 1000 size 1500 Type escape >>>>> sequence to abort. >>>>> Sending 1000, 1500-byte ICMP Echos to 172.16.18.98, timeout is 2 >>> seconds: >>>>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>>> Success rate is 100 percent (1000/1000), round-trip min/avg/max = >>>>> 40/43/60 ms >>>>> >>>>> BR, >>>>> Mohammad >>>>> >>>>>> Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 14:53:17 +0530 >>>>>> Subject: Interworking in L2VPN >>>>>> From: [email protected] >>>>>> To: [email protected]; [email protected] >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi all >>>>>> >>>>>> I have> >>> _____ Subscription information may be found at: >>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> With Warmest Regards, >>>> >>>> CCIE KID >>>> CCIE#29992 (Security) >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Message: 3 >>>> Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 09:53:08 +0200 >>>> From: Ren? Huet <[email protected] <javascript:;>> >>>> To: [email protected] <javascript:;> >>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] WB-1 LAB-17 TASK-17.3 >>>> Message-ID: >>>> >>>> <CADFAz+6e2xs2+a-=5E=6eJTxKM7nMUdxkyezaSyfQLkeSxVz=w...@mail.gmail.com<javascript:;> >>> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >>>> >>>> Dear all, >>>> >>>> For the WB-1 LAB-17 TASK-17.3 >>>> >>>> Why we don't deny any 150.100.78.8 >>>> what is the difference between deny any 150.100.78.8 or Network >> address? >>>> >>>> Normally if I deny any 150.100.78.8 (NVI) is ok no ? >>>> >>>> If anyone has an explanation I'm interested >>>> >>>> Best regards >>>> >>>> Ren? >>>> >>>> >>>> End of CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 76, Issue 48 >>>> *************************************** >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>> >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >>> >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >> > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
