I'll admit it, I got a chuckle from it Cheers, Donald Robb Productive Networks / Network Consultant ______________________________________________________________ CCIE Written, CCIP, CCSP, CCDP, CCNP, CCNA: Voice, JNCIP, SCP, MCSA 2003, Security+, CCSE.R65, PACE Experts-Exchange: Guru - R&S
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jay McMickle Sent: May-19-12 12:44 PM To: Imran Ali Cc: Tony Singh; [email protected] Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIE how to pass the lab (light humour) Wow, Imran. That was a bit harsh! He mentioned it as a joke. Regards, Jay McMickle- CCIE #35355 (R&S) Sent from iJay On May 19, 2012, at 12:43 PM, Imran Ali <[email protected]> wrote: > Tony , why dont you follow Darby , and quit if you are that much > impressd by his non-sense . > > This froum is for techincal people , please post technical questions > or simply stay away > > On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Tony Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > >> This article is good humour, enjoy >> >> http://ccieflyer.com/2010-02-Darby-Weaver-Achilles-Heel.php >> >> BR >> >> Tony >> >> CCNP CCNA R&S JNCIS-SEC MCSE >> >> Sent from my iPhone on 3 >> >> On 17 May 2012, at 17:00, [email protected] wrote: >> >>> Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to >>> [email protected] >>> >>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >>> [email protected] >>> >>> You can reach the person managing the list at >>> [email protected] >>> >>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >>> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..." >>> >>> >>> Today's Topics: >>> >>> 1. Re: ? (Adam Booth) >>> 2. Re: Interworking in L2VPN (CCIE KID) 3. WB-1 LAB-17 TASK-17.3 >>> (Ren? Huet) >>> >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> -- >>> >>> Message: 1 >>> Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 06:46:35 +1000 >>> From: Adam Booth <[email protected]> >>> To: "Bodnar, Edward" <[email protected]> >>> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] ? >>> Message-ID: >>> >>> <CAKXsBmpn4KoO45ybp-3=pd31hmpsext-bw28_h1ck2l5ltc...@mail.gmail.com> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >>> >>> Hi Edward, >>> >>> The Switch adds these via option 82 to the DHCP packet made by a >>> DHCP client, so the DHCP server can make some decisions as to what >>> to do with that user. Generally Circuit-Id is used to identify the >>> originating >> switch >>> and switch port that the customer is connected to, and the remote-id >>> may >> be >>> a service id/customer id. >>> >>> Depending on your context you could use the Circuit-Id/Remote-Id to >> always >>> allocate a specific IP address to a Switch port regardless as to >>> what the mac address of the client device is. >>> >>> In a situation where the network infrastructure owner is different >>> to the service owner (e.g. a wholesale environment) the >>> infrastructure owner may move ports associated with a customer >>> around - so the wholesale operator >> in >>> a lot of instances is told to rely on using the remote-id and not >>> the circuit-id to identify their client (but knowing the circuit-id >>> may be useful if there is a fault) >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Adam >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:25 AM, Bodnar, Edward < >> [email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Can anybody provide some clarity around these commands. >>>> >>>> Ip dhcp snooping information option format-type ( circuit-id | >> remote-id ) >>>> >>>> >>>> Need info on what they do and why I would use them. >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >> please >>>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>>> >>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>> >>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Message: 2 >>> Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 12:45:36 +0530 >>> From: CCIE KID <[email protected]> >>> To: Mohammad Khalil <[email protected]> >>> Cc: [email protected], [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Interworking in L2VPN >>> Message-ID: >>> >>> <CAJuc+Q9ZzpE48kSd3YE=y2kshay5e5x9ovuhn9gykblhzhk...@mail.gmail.com> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >>> >>> Thanks Mohammad, >>> >>> What are the parameters to match when u want to form a Targeted LDP >>> peer between two PE's if u have two different VC Types in them. >>> For example on one side u have Ethernet and on the other side u have FR. >>> What are the parameters to match on both the sides . >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Mohammad Khalil >>> <[email protected] >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi , i did a similar setup using xconnect between EThernet and ATM >>>> , please find below (note that TESTING1 is connected to PE1 through >>>> NSP >> and >>>> TESTING2 is connected to PE2) >>>> >>>> TESTING1 >>>> >>>> interface ATM0 >>>> description *** TEC-TEC2 ATM 5/7 *** no ip address no atm >>>> ilmi-keepalive dsl operating-mode ansi-dmt end interface ATM0.1 >>>> point-to-point ip address 172.16.18.98 255.255.255.252 pvc 2/222 >>>> protocol ip 172.16.18.97 broadcast ! >>>> interface ATM0.2 point-to-point >>>> ip address 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.252 pvc 30/30 protocol ip >>>> 10.10.10.1 broadcast >>>> >>>> TESTING2 >>>> >>>> interface FastEthernet0/0 >>>> no ip address >>>> duplex full >>>> speed 100 >>>> interface FastEthernet0/0.94 >>>> encapsulation dot1Q 94 >>>> ip address 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.252 ! >>>> interface FastEthernet0/0.99 >>>> encapsulation dot1Q 99 >>>> ip address 172.16.18.97 255.255.255.252 >>>> >>>> PE1 >>>> >>>> interface GigabitEthernet2/1/0 >>>> mtu 1530 >>>> ip address 62.215.0.49 255.255.255.252 ip ospf network >>>> point-to-point negotiation auto mpls ip end interface ATM2/0/0 >>>> description *** ATM STM-1 Link To 6400-TEC ( ATM3/1/0 ) *** no ip >>>> address load-interval 30 no atm enable-ilmi-trap no atm >>>> ilmi-keepalive pvc 0/5 qsaal ! >>>> pvc 0/16 ilmi >>>> ! >>>> End >>>> interface ATM2/0/0.2020 point-to-point no atm enable-ilmi-trap pvc >>>> 12/195 l2transport encapsulation aal5snap xconnect 62.215.0.222 133 >>>> pw-class inter-ether >>>> >>>> PE2 >>>> >>>> interface GigabitEthernet0/1 >>>> mtu 1530 >>>> ip address 62.215.0.50 255.255.255.252 ip ospf network >>>> point-to-point media-type sfp speed auto duplex auto negotiation >>>> auto mpls ip >>>> >>>> interface GigabitEthernet0/3 >>>> mtu 4470 >>>> no ip address >>>> media-type rj45 >>>> speed auto >>>> duplex full >>>> negotiation auto >>>> end >>>> interface GigabitEthernet0/3.99 >>>> encapsulation dot1Q 99 >>>> xconnect 62.215.0.194 133 pw-class inter-ether >>>> >>>> PE2#sh xconnect all >>>> Legend: XC ST=Xconnect State S1=Segment1 State S2=Segment2 State >>>> UP=Up DN=Down AD=Admin Down IA=Inactive SB=Standby RV=Recovering >>>> NH=No Hardware XC ST Segment 1 S1 Segment 2 >>>> S2 >>>> >> ------+---------------------------------+--+------------------------- >> ------+---------------------------------+--+---- >>>> ----+-- >>>> UP ac Gi0/3.99:99(Eth VLAN) UP mpls 62.215.0.194:133 UP >>>> >>>> PE2#sh xconnect peer 62.215.0.194 all detail Core network division >>>> Xconnect test >>>> Distribution: Confidential Page 5 >>>> Legend: XC ST=Xconnect State S1=Segment1 State S2=Segment2 State >>>> UP=Up DN=Down AD=Admin Down IA=Inactive SB=Standby RV=Recovering >>>> NH=No Hardware XC ST Segment 1 S1 Segment 2 >>>> S2 >>>> >> ------+---------------------------------+--+------------------------- >> ------+---------------------------------+--+---- >>>> ----+-- >>>> UP ac Gi0/3.99:99(Eth VLAN) UP mpls 62.215.0.194:133 UP >>>> Interworking: ip Local VC label 276 Remote VC label 3090 >>>> pw-class: inter-ether >>>> >>>> TEC-TEST#sh mpls l2transport binding 133 Destination Address: >>>> 62.215.0.194, VC ID: 133 Local Label: 276 >>>> Cbit: 1, VC Type: IP, GroupID: 0 >>>> MTU: 4470, Interface Desc: n/a >>>> VCCV: CC Type: CW [1], RA [2] >>>> CV Type: LSPV [2] >>>> Remote Label: 3090 >>>> Cbit: 1, VC Type: IP, GroupID: 0 >>>> MTU: 4470, Interface Desc: n/a >>>> VCCV: CC Type: RA [2] >>>> CV Type: LSPV [2] >>>> TEC-TEST#sh mpls l2transport vc 133 detail Local interface: >>>> Gi0/3.99 up, line protocol up, Eth VLAN 99 up MPLS VC type is Eth >>>> VLAN, interworking type is IP Destination address: 62.215.0.194, VC >>>> ID: 133, VC status: up Output interface: Gi0/1, imposed label stack >>>> {3090} Preferred path: not configured Default path: active Next >>>> hop: 62.215.0.49 Create time: 03:55:11, last status change time: >>>> 03:55:11 Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 62.215.0.194:0 up Targeted >>>> Hello: 62.215.0.222(LDP Id) -> 62.215.0.194 Status TLV support >>>> (local/remote) : enabled/supported Label/status state machine : >>>> established, LruRru Last local dataplane status rcvd: no fault Last >>>> local SSS circuit status rcvd: no fault Last local SSS circuit >>>> status sent: no fault Last local LDP TLV status sent: no fault Last >>>> remote LDP TLV status rcvd: no fault MPLS VC labels: local 276, >>>> remote 3090 Group ID: local 0, remote 0 >>>> MTU: local 4470, remote 4470 >>>> Remote interface description: >>>> Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled VC statistics: >>>> packet totals: receive 1034, send 1034 byte totals: receive >>>> 1066540, send 1089288 packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0 >>>> Core network division Xconnect test >>>> Distribution: Confidential Page 6 >>>> PING >>>> TESTING2#ping 172.16.18.98 repeat 1000 size 1500 Type escape >>>> sequence to abort. >>>> Sending 1000, 1500-byte ICMP Echos to 172.16.18.98, timeout is 2 >> seconds: >>>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>> Success rate is 100 percent (1000/1000), round-trip min/avg/max = >>>> 40/43/60 ms >>>> >>>> BR, >>>> Mohammad >>>> >>>>> Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 14:53:17 +0530 >>>>> Subject: Interworking in L2VPN >>>>> From: [email protected] >>>>> To: [email protected]; [email protected] >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi all >>>>> >>>>> I have a scenario where my Frame-Relay to Ethernet interworking is >>>>> not working properly. Can someone tell me what are all the >>>>> parameters to >>>> match >>>>> when forming a T-LDP Pseudowire to be established between Ethernet >>>>> one >>>> side >>>>> of pseudowire and Frame Relay on the other side of Pseudowire. >>>>> I know that there are certain parameters to match to make my >>>>> Pseudowire T-LDP up The parameters are : >>>>> 1.VC-ID >>>>> 2.VC Type ( Port, VLAN, etc) >>>>> 3.Interface MTU (AC) >>>>> 4. LDP password >>>>> >>>>> But when u have interworking configured on both sides , Ur VC Type >>>>> wont be matched on both the sides. In this cases, how will my >>>>> T-LDP session >>>> will >>>>> be up ? >>>>> >>>>> How will the Control plane signaling happens when there is a >>>>> different >> VC >>>>> types on both sides and i have configured my Interworking on both >>>>> the >>>> sides. >>>>> >>>>> How will the router signal the other end of the peer to know which >>>>> VC >>>> Type >>>>> it is using and also the Interworking has been configured ? >>>>> >>>>> Is the use of Control Word comes into picture here ? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> With Warmest Regards, >>>>> >>>>> CCIE KID >>>>> CCIE#29992 (Security) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >>>>> >>>>> __________________________________________________________________ >>>>> _____ Subscription information may be found at: >>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> With Warmest Regards, >>> >>> CCIE KID >>> CCIE#29992 (Security) >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Message: 3 >>> Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 09:53:08 +0200 >>> From: Ren? Huet <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] WB-1 LAB-17 TASK-17.3 >>> Message-ID: >>> >>> <CADFAz+6e2xs2+a-=5E=6eJTxKM7nMUdxkyezaSyfQLkeSxVz=w...@mail.gmail.com> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >>> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> For the WB-1 LAB-17 TASK-17.3 >>> >>> Why we don't deny any 150.100.78.8 >>> what is the difference between deny any 150.100.78.8 or Network address? >>> >>> Normally if I deny any 150.100.78.8 (NVI) is ok no ? >>> >>> If anyone has an explanation I'm interested >>> >>> Best regards >>> >>> Ren? >>> >>> >>> End of CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 76, Issue 48 >>> *************************************** >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >> please visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >> > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > please visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
