Thanks Ryan. Just a query, would it cost any points if still had ipv4 peering on for that Lab 28 ?
Regards Rakesh M > Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 18:38:25 +0300 > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] no bgp default ipv4-unicast ? > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > > Rakesh, > > Correct. When dealing with MPLS VPNs and BGP peerings, in most cases you > will always need vpnv4 address families to exchange the VPN routes. In the > case of that lab, your IGP is OSPF so the internal routes are exchanged with > OSPF, but if the IGP were BGP, then you would need a way to exchange > internal routing information with the rest of the internal network. For > that lab, VPNV4 peerings will suffice. > > > Respectfully, > > Ryan Krcelic > > > On 1/5/13 5:33 PM, "Rock's M" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I am speaking about LAB28, If the question requires to setup MP-BGP between > > two routers, does that mean we should not form the default ip bgp peering > > session between two routers and remove the default session with the > > mentioned > > command > > in the subject line > > > > Thank you > > Rakesh M > > > > _______________________________________________ > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > > V/r, > > Ryan Krcelic > > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
