You may want to try this on the router: class-map match-any CUSTOMER match vlan 240 match vlan 241 ! policy-map POLICE-CUSTOMER class CUSTOMER police cir 250000000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop ! interface GigabitEthernet1/1 service-policy input POLICE-CUSTOMER !
If this is on the switch, you may want to use aggregate policer, as it was designed for this precise purpose. -- Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S) Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Onur Gashi <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > First of all sorry for all confusion, and thank you for your time! > > I'd like to rate limit two points of a clinet with two different vlans which > are terminated in two sub-interfaces with the same policy-map. So basically > the client would have a shared limit in both locations. > > So the client basically has a limit of max. 250Mbps in both locations > together. I want to be able to rate limit the client in two different vlans > with one limit. > > Thanks again! > > > > >>________________________________ >> From: imad Abdallah <[email protected]> >>To: Onur Gashi <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" >><[email protected]> >>Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 9:52 AM >>Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Traffic Shaping >> >> >> >>Hi Onur, >> >> >>What would you exactly like to do with shaping that you can not accomplish >>with outbound ts? >> >> >>> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 00:34:36 -0800 >>> From: [email protected] >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Traffic Shaping >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I've been trying to shape ingress traffic for two sub interfaces with a >>> common class-map, so they will have a shared limit. So far unsuccessful... >>> Tried to create a class-map to match a particular Access-list with the IP >>> addresses of both sub interfaces, applied the class-map to policy-map, and >>> tried to apply it to both sub interfaces, I think I need to apply this >>> limit to the outbound interfaces, not to the sub interfaces where the >>> traffic comes inbound. >>> >>> class-map match-all NET >>> match access-group name NET-ACL >>> >>> policy-map NET >>> class NET >>> police cir 256000000 >>> >>> service-policy output NET --- to sub interface 1/1.240 >>> service-policy output NET --- to sub interface 1/1.241 >>> >>> ip access-list standard NET-ACL >>> permit 10.15.16.0 0.0.0.3 >>> permit 10.15.16.4 0.0.0.3 >>> >>> If there is a possible solution to avoid applying this policy-map to the >>> outbound interface, I'd like to see it. >>> >>> Is there a way to achieve this? >>> >>> >>> Thanks in advance. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Onur Gashi >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>> >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>> >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
