Bob nicely put...

The important thing to distinguish as this is a real confusing topic
for me is knowing the difference between the control-plane vs
data-plane

the control-plane is where the vpnv4 speakers will exchange the NLRI
which would include the RD and the RT as an extended community but the
data-plane cannot use this information when making a packet forwarding
decision therefore the vpnv4 speakers add the vpn label for a customer
prefix (called the inner label) to uniquely identify the customer
prefix for delivery.....this is a separate process from the (outer
label) mpls transport label to get to PE in the first place (ldp/tdp
ospf/is-is derived)

here is a good visual for control-plane NLRI that vpnv4 speakers would
pass to each other, I also note here that label 19 is showing can
someone confirm that vpnv4 speakers also pass the inner label to each
other via NLRI control-plane?

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_n3Sbk_2ZV-g/TCTtlR2wekI/AAAAAAAAAcY/P_W77wIYxGA/s1600/2.JPG


BR

Tony


On 28 March 2013 13:59, Bob McCouch <[email protected]> wrote:
> Are you saying that using the following as an example:
>
> router bgp 1
>  bgp router-id 1.1.1.1
>  no bgp default ipv4-unicast
>  neighbor 1.1.1.2 remote-as 100
>  !
>  address-family ipv4
>  exit-address-family
>  !
>  address-family vpnv4
>   neighbor 1.1.1.2 activate
>   neighbor 1.1.1.2 send-community extended
>  exit-address-family
>  !
>  address-family ipv4 vrf BLUE
>   neighbor 2.2.2.2 remote-as 200
>   neighbor 2.2.2.2 activate
>  exit-address-family
>
> You configured your neighbor like 2.2.2.2 and the solution you were looking
> at had the neighbor configured like 1.1.1.2?
>
> The first question is: Did your solution work? If I understand what you did
> right, I'd imagine it did not work.
>
> The neighbor 1.1.1.2 in my example that is configured under the routing
> process and activated under the VPNv4 address family would be for another
> MPLS PE peer that you're exchanging VPN labels with (another PE router
> elsewhere in the MPLS network). That peering would not exchange 32-bit IPv4
> prefixes, but 96-bit VPNv4 prefixes that include the RD for uniqueness,
> along with extended community values to indicate the label used for that
> VPN path.
>
> The example neighbor 2.2.2.2 in the example above would be the CE peer.
> This neighbor is configured *only* under the IPv4 VRF address family (not
> at the routing process level) and is how the PE builds a BGP peering with
> the CE router *within* the VRF. The peer router in this case would be
> running "normal" BGP and totally unaware of the MPLS label exchange going
> on behind the scenes.
>
> The VPNv4 address family is a special case for BGP and it's what makes MPLS
> L3VPN work. The IPv4 VRF address family configuration under BGP is pretty
> much the same as any other PE-CE routing protocol configuration like if you
> did an address family under RIP or EIGRP to use those as the PE-CE protocol.
>
> Does that help?
>
> Bob
> CCIE #38296
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Houssam Chahine
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I have a small question about address family.
>>
>> In Lab 3 Vol2, the peering is configured under the router process and
>> activated under vpnv4 address family.
>>
>> What i did was configuring the peering under the ipv4 vrf address family.
>>
>> I would like to know what is the difference between configuring the
>> neighbor statement under the router process and under the address family.
>> Furthermore is what i did correct or wrong.
>>
>> Thank you all in advance.
>> _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>
>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs

Reply via email to