Hi hesham. as i found... in my development of network engineer... the lab is just a preparation of what you could found in the real world... even some labs are so difficult and messy than appears to be a real working environment.
i had some friends within i exchange some experience and point of view of some problems, we had some brain storming together and found another view of some problem or solution for a defined problem.. good friends are the best way to aprove an exam or pass the lab. and don't worry, if you don't cheat to get your magic number, then you'll improve so damn good, than if someone just figureout asking about what is a shamlink you could answer even with the RFC with what chapter and what line in that chapter talks about this feature on the OSPF protocol. PS: For those are wondering what is a sham link just check RFC 4577 OSPFv2 and go to chapter 4.2.7. best regards. Edgar Still #unnumbered On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem < [email protected]> wrote: > Any opinion should be respected even if its against IPX:) its free of > speech and we don't make any bad talks about anyone. > We are not in jail here:) we can speak any say our opinion freeily. > > Thanks brother have you ever made any attempts? > I wish you all success. > I am CCNA and NP routing and switching but I dont have extensive hands-on > experience on routing , IPV6 , BGP , MPLS , OSPF and that stuff. > > Thanks, > Hesham > > > On 7 October 2013 18:55, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi again. >> >> We'll in my humble opinion, I preffer kick ass IPExpert workbooks for >> over IN* ones. >> >> Why? simple... >> >> Technology focus over and over again in the IPExpert wb, on the other >> vendor the deployment of the workbook is just confuse ... >> >> Again is my humble opinion >> >> Best regards >> >> Edgar >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 07-10-2013, at 21:41, Hesham Abdelkereem <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Edgar, >> >> Thanks for your great contribution. I just would like to clarify why do >> we have 9 routers + 3 2621 Backbone >> INE is just 6 Router + 3 Backbones that gives total of 9 routers all. >> >> Hahaha It got me confused now , Now I don't know which is better topology >> IPX or INE? >> I know that owners here may get mad at me because I mentioned INE but in >> all cases I am not promoting them or market their product so I should be >> fine:). >> >> >> >> >> On 7 October 2013 17:35, Edgar Mauricio Diaz Orellana < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> as in ipexpert lab workbooks, you need >>> >>> 1x26x1xm router (Access Server) >>> 3x26x1xm routers (BACK BONE) >>> >>> 4xCAT3560-24TS-S >>> >>> 7x2811 Routers >>> 1x3825/3845 Router >>> 1x2611/2800 series with almost 1 NM Slot/3620/3640/3660 as Frame relay >>> switch (R3) >>> 1x2801 Router as R9 >>> >>> >>> if you like to play with udld you need 2xSFP-SX-MM with a multimode >>> lc-lc patch to connect between CAT1 to R2 (gig0/1-Gig0/1) >>> >>> that's my contribution! >>> >>> best regards.! >>> >>> Edgar >>> Still #unnumbered! >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> The training vendors usually are very close to the real lab as well. >>>> I used INE for Voice stuff and all the equipment and modules are same as >>>> the real lab the only difference was the routers itself. >>>> I am not intending to breach NDA or asking for the exam content itself >>>> such >>>> as questions , answers , usernames , ip addresses or passwords but the >>>> thing is the Blueprint is not clear at all about the modules. >>>> In the Voice track blueprint it was more clear about the T1/E1 modules >>>> needs to be used in the test but in R/S scenario they just give a very >>>> little information. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 7 October 2013 12:37, Bob McCouch <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> > Pick the topology for the training vendor you're using and build to >>>> that. >>>> > >>>> > The exact topology and models in use in the real lab are not >>>> published in >>>> > their entirety. If someone gives you an exact list for the real lab, >>>> > they're lying or violating NDA. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem < >>>> > [email protected]> wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> Dear Experts, >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> I just would like to know the CCE R/S V4 Lab Equipment >>>> >> >>>> >> I know for fact if I am not mistaken it should be >>>> >> >>>> >> 6X CISCO 1841 Routers >>>> >> 3X CISCO 3825 Routers for Backbone >>>> >> 4X Catalyst 3560 Switches 3560-24TS-S >>>> >> >>>> >> I already read this link >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> http://www.ine.com/downloads/routing_switching_rack_rental_hardware_specification_v1.2.pdf >>>> >> >>>> >> But I would like to make the lab as close to the real V4 lab as much >>>> as >>>> >> possible for better and speedy strategy. >>>> >> >>>> >> I would like to know in detail how many WIC-1T should be installed >>>> and how >>>> >> about the Backbone do they use WIC-1T or NM-4A/S >>>> >> >>>> >> I am just newbie but it would be good to start build the lab as it >>>> will >>>> >> ease the studies. >>>> >> >>>> >> Many Thanks, >>>> >> Hesham >>>> >> _______________________________________________ >>>> >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>>> please >>>> >> visit www.ipexpert.com >>>> >> >>>> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>> >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>> >> >>>> >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>>> >>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>> >>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
