I knew I typed that a bit too quick.y Make that "match packet len min 400 max 600"
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Joe S <[email protected]> wrote: > class-map YYY > match packet min 400 max 600 > > route-map XXX > class YYY > drop > > > > > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Ryan Krcelic <[email protected]>wrote: > >> How exactly are your dropping the traffic? route-maps don't have a >> "drop" feature, you just set the interface to null0. >> >> If you are using a route-map to reference an access-list, then remember >> that the ACL that is referenced is used only to fullfill the requirements >> of the route-map, not to permit or deny the traffic. >> >> An ACL could also be used, but you have to watch out for restrictions on >> the questions. >> V/r, >> >> Ryan Krcelic >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Joe S <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Alright so I'm running through lab book 2 in prep for my lab in 33 days. >>> Small things are starting to make me wonder if my solutions are wrong or >>> if >>> I'm just not doing it the way that the author did it, so I'm probably be >>> going to asking for opinions from the folks out in mailing list land. >>> >>> Question the first: "Drop ICMP packets inbound between sizes X and Y". >>> >>> Pretty obvious. Route-map check sizes and then does a drop if packet size >>> is between X and Y. Put it in, seems to work just fine. Then I'm going >>> through the DSG and checking my answers and I see that the solution >>> doesn't >>> use drop it uses "set interface null 0". >>> >>> Is one solution more right than the other? Or are the both viable and I'm >>> being overly cautious? >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 10:49 PM, <[email protected] >>> >wrote: >>> >>> > Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to >>> > [email protected] >>> > >>> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >>> > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >>> > [email protected] >>> > >>> > You can reach the person managing the list at >>> > [email protected] >>> > >>> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >>> > than "Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..." >>> > >>> > >>> > Today's Topics: >>> > >>> > 1. Re: CCIE R/S Lab Equipment List ([email protected]) >>> > 2. Re: CCIE R/S Lab Equipment List (Hesham Abdelkereem) >>> > 3. Re: CCIE R/S Lab Equipment List (Edgar Mauricio Diaz Orellana) >>> > 4. Re: CCIE R/S Lab Equipment List (Hesham Abdelkereem) >>> > >>> > >>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > >>> > Message: 1 >>> > Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 22:55:38 -0300 >>> > From: [email protected] >>> > To: Hesham Abdelkereem <[email protected]> >>> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIE R/S Lab Equipment List >>> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >>> > >>> > Hi again. >>> > >>> > We'll in my humble opinion, I preffer kick ass IPExpert workbooks for >>> over >>> > IN* ones. >>> > >>> > Why? simple... >>> > >>> > Technology focus over and over again in the IPExpert wb, on the other >>> > vendor the deployment of the workbook is just confuse ... >>> > >>> > Again is my humble opinion >>> > >>> > Best regards >>> > >>> > Edgar >>> > >>> > Sent from my iPhone >>> > >>> > > On 07-10-2013, at 21:41, Hesham Abdelkereem < >>> [email protected]> >>> > wrote: >>> > > >>> > > Hi Edgar, >>> > > >>> > > Thanks for your great contribution. I just would like to clarify why >>> do >>> > we have 9 routers + 3 2621 Backbone >>> > > INE is just 6 Router + 3 Backbones that gives total of 9 routers all. >>> > > >>> > > Hahaha It got me confused now , Now I don't know which is better >>> > topology IPX or INE? >>> > > I know that owners here may get mad at me because I mentioned INE >>> but in >>> > all cases I am not promoting them or market their product so I should >>> be >>> > fine:). >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >> On 7 October 2013 17:35, Edgar Mauricio Diaz Orellana < >>> > [email protected]> wrote: >>> > >> as in ipexpert lab workbooks, you need >>> > >> >>> > >> 1x26x1xm router (Access Server) >>> > >> 3x26x1xm routers (BACK BONE) >>> > >> >>> > >> 4xCAT3560-24TS-S >>> > >> >>> > >> 7x2811 Routers >>> > >> 1x3825/3845 Router >>> > >> 1x2611/2800 series with almost 1 NM Slot/3620/3640/3660 as Frame >>> relay >>> > switch (R3) >>> > >> 1x2801 Router as R9 >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> if you like to play with udld you need 2xSFP-SX-MM with a multimode >>> > lc-lc patch to connect between CAT1 to R2 (gig0/1-Gig0/1) >>> > >> >>> > >> that's my contribution! >>> > >> >>> > >> best regards.! >>> > >> >>> > >> Edgar >>> > >> Still #unnumbered! >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem < >>> > [email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> The training vendors usually are very close to the real lab as >>> well. >>> > >>> I used INE for Voice stuff and all the equipment and modules are >>> same >>> > as >>> > >>> the real lab the only difference was the routers itself. >>> > >>> I am not intending to breach NDA or asking for the exam content >>> itself >>> > such >>> > >>> as questions , answers , usernames , ip addresses or passwords but >>> the >>> > >>> thing is the Blueprint is not clear at all about the modules. >>> > >>> In the Voice track blueprint it was more clear about the T1/E1 >>> modules >>> > >>> needs to be used in the test but in R/S scenario they just give a >>> very >>> > >>> little information. >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> On 7 October 2013 12:37, Bob McCouch <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> >>> > >>> > Pick the topology for the training vendor you're using and build >>> to >>> > that. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > The exact topology and models in use in the real lab are not >>> > published in >>> > >>> > their entirety. If someone gives you an exact list for the real >>> lab, >>> > >>> > they're lying or violating NDA. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem < >>> > >>> > [email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >> Dear Experts, >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> I just would like to know the CCE R/S V4 Lab Equipment >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> I know for fact if I am not mistaken it should be >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> 6X CISCO 1841 Routers >>> > >>> >> 3X CISCO 3825 Routers for Backbone >>> > >>> >> 4X Catalyst 3560 Switches 3560-24TS-S >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> I already read this link >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> http://www.ine.com/downloads/routing_switching_rack_rental_hardware_specification_v1.2.pdf >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> But I would like to make the lab as close to the real V4 lab as >>> > much as >>> > >>> >> possible for better and speedy strategy. >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> I would like to know in detail how many WIC-1T should be >>> installed >>> > and how >>> > >>> >> about the Backbone do they use WIC-1T or NM-4A/S >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> I am just newbie but it would be good to start build the lab as >>> it >>> > will >>> > >>> >> ease the studies. >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> Many Thanks, >>> > >>> >> Hesham >>> > >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> > >>> >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab >>> training, >>> > please >>> > >>> >> visit www.ipexpert.com >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>> > >>> >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ >>> > >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>> > please visit www.ipexpert.com >>> > >>> >>> > >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>> > www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> > ------------------------------ >>> > >>> > Message: 2 >>> > Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 18:59:10 -0700 >>> > From: Hesham Abdelkereem <[email protected]> >>> > To: Edgar Mauricio Diaz Orellana <[email protected]> >>> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIE R/S Lab Equipment List >>> > Message-ID: >>> > <CAA-UhVErRUT9gpaxBi3o== >>> > [email protected]> >>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >>> > >>> > Any opinion should be respected even if its against IPX:) its free of >>> > speech and we don't make any bad talks about anyone. >>> > We are not in jail here:) we can speak any say our opinion freeily. >>> > >>> > Thanks brother have you ever made any attempts? >>> > I wish you all success. >>> > I am CCNA and NP routing and switching but I dont have extensive >>> hands-on >>> > experience on routing , IPV6 , BGP , MPLS , OSPF and that stuff. >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > Hesham >>> > >>> > >>> > On 7 October 2013 18:55, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > > Hi again. >>> > > >>> > > We'll in my humble opinion, I preffer kick ass IPExpert workbooks for >>> > over >>> > > IN* ones. >>> > > >>> > > Why? simple... >>> > > >>> > > Technology focus over and over again in the IPExpert wb, on the other >>> > > vendor the deployment of the workbook is just confuse ... >>> > > >>> > > Again is my humble opinion >>> > > >>> > > Best regards >>> > > >>> > > Edgar >>> > > >>> > > Sent from my iPhone >>> > > >>> > > On 07-10-2013, at 21:41, Hesham Abdelkereem < >>> [email protected]> >>> > > wrote: >>> > > >>> > > Hi Edgar, >>> > > >>> > > Thanks for your great contribution. I just would like to clarify why >>> do >>> > we >>> > > have 9 routers + 3 2621 Backbone >>> > > INE is just 6 Router + 3 Backbones that gives total of 9 routers all. >>> > > >>> > > Hahaha It got me confused now , Now I don't know which is better >>> topology >>> > > IPX or INE? >>> > > I know that owners here may get mad at me because I mentioned INE >>> but in >>> > > all cases I am not promoting them or market their product so I >>> should be >>> > > fine:). >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > On 7 October 2013 17:35, Edgar Mauricio Diaz Orellana < >>> > > [email protected]> wrote: >>> > > >>> > >> as in ipexpert lab workbooks, you need >>> > >> >>> > >> 1x26x1xm router (Access Server) >>> > >> 3x26x1xm routers (BACK BONE) >>> > >> >>> > >> 4xCAT3560-24TS-S >>> > >> >>> > >> 7x2811 Routers >>> > >> 1x3825/3845 Router >>> > >> 1x2611/2800 series with almost 1 NM Slot/3620/3640/3660 as Frame >>> relay >>> > >> switch (R3) >>> > >> 1x2801 Router as R9 >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> if you like to play with udld you need 2xSFP-SX-MM with a multimode >>> > lc-lc >>> > >> patch to connect between CAT1 to R2 (gig0/1-Gig0/1) >>> > >> >>> > >> that's my contribution! >>> > >> >>> > >> best regards.! >>> > >> >>> > >> Edgar >>> > >> Still #unnumbered! >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem < >>> > >> [email protected]> wrote: >>> > >> >>> > >>> The training vendors usually are very close to the real lab as >>> well. >>> > >>> I used INE for Voice stuff and all the equipment and modules are >>> same >>> > as >>> > >>> the real lab the only difference was the routers itself. >>> > >>> I am not intending to breach NDA or asking for the exam content >>> itself >>> > >>> such >>> > >>> as questions , answers , usernames , ip addresses or passwords but >>> the >>> > >>> thing is the Blueprint is not clear at all about the modules. >>> > >>> In the Voice track blueprint it was more clear about the T1/E1 >>> modules >>> > >>> needs to be used in the test but in R/S scenario they just give a >>> very >>> > >>> little information. >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> On 7 October 2013 12:37, Bob McCouch <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> >>> > >>> > Pick the topology for the training vendor you're using and build >>> to >>> > >>> that. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > The exact topology and models in use in the real lab are not >>> > published >>> > >>> in >>> > >>> > their entirety. If someone gives you an exact list for the real >>> lab, >>> > >>> > they're lying or violating NDA. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem < >>> > >>> > [email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >> Dear Experts, >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> I just would like to know the CCE R/S V4 Lab Equipment >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> I know for fact if I am not mistaken it should be >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> 6X CISCO 1841 Routers >>> > >>> >> 3X CISCO 3825 Routers for Backbone >>> > >>> >> 4X Catalyst 3560 Switches 3560-24TS-S >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> I already read this link >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> http://www.ine.com/downloads/routing_switching_rack_rental_hardware_specification_v1.2.pdf >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> But I would like to make the lab as close to the real V4 lab as >>> much >>> > >>> as >>> > >>> >> possible for better and speedy strategy. >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> I would like to know in detail how many WIC-1T should be >>> installed >>> > >>> and how >>> > >>> >> about the Backbone do they use WIC-1T or NM-4A/S >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> I am just newbie but it would be good to start build the lab as >>> it >>> > >>> will >>> > >>> >> ease the studies. >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> Many Thanks, >>> > >>> >> Hesham >>> > >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> > >>> >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab >>> training, >>> > >>> please >>> > >>> >> visit www.ipexpert.com >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>> > >>> >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ >>> > >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>> > >>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>> > >>> >>> > >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>> > >>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>> > >>> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> > ------------------------------ >>> > >>> > Message: 3 >>> > Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 00:34:19 -0300 >>> > From: Edgar Mauricio Diaz Orellana <[email protected]> >>> > To: Hesham Abdelkereem <[email protected]> >>> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIE R/S Lab Equipment List >>> > Message-ID: >>> > <CAP_QRV68_CO8pOHSoXKzuu4Lvcwf= >>> > [email protected]> >>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >>> > >>> > Hi hesham. >>> > >>> > as i found... in my development of network engineer... the lab is just >>> a >>> > preparation of what you could found in the real world... even some >>> labs are >>> > so difficult and messy than appears to be a real working environment. >>> > >>> > i had some friends within i exchange some experience and point of view >>> of >>> > some problems, we had some brain storming together and found another >>> view >>> > of some problem or solution for a defined problem.. >>> > >>> > good friends are the best way to aprove an exam or pass the lab. >>> > >>> > and don't worry, if you don't cheat to get your magic number, then >>> you'll >>> > improve so damn good, than if someone just figureout asking about what >>> is a >>> > shamlink you could answer even with the RFC with what chapter and what >>> line >>> > in that chapter talks about this feature on the OSPF protocol. >>> > >>> > PS: For those are wondering what is a sham link just check RFC 4577 >>> OSPFv2 >>> > and go to chapter 4.2.7. >>> > >>> > best regards. >>> > >>> > >>> > Edgar >>> > Still #unnumbered >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem < >>> > [email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > > Any opinion should be respected even if its against IPX:) its free of >>> > > speech and we don't make any bad talks about anyone. >>> > > We are not in jail here:) we can speak any say our opinion freeily. >>> > > >>> > > Thanks brother have you ever made any attempts? >>> > > I wish you all success. >>> > > I am CCNA and NP routing and switching but I dont have extensive >>> hands-on >>> > > experience on routing , IPV6 , BGP , MPLS , OSPF and that stuff. >>> > > >>> > > Thanks, >>> > > Hesham >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > On 7 October 2013 18:55, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > >>> > >> Hi again. >>> > >> >>> > >> We'll in my humble opinion, I preffer kick ass IPExpert workbooks >>> for >>> > >> over IN* ones. >>> > >> >>> > >> Why? simple... >>> > >> >>> > >> Technology focus over and over again in the IPExpert wb, on the >>> other >>> > >> vendor the deployment of the workbook is just confuse ... >>> > >> >>> > >> Again is my humble opinion >>> > >> >>> > >> Best regards >>> > >> >>> > >> Edgar >>> > >> >>> > >> Sent from my iPhone >>> > >> >>> > >> On 07-10-2013, at 21:41, Hesham Abdelkereem < >>> [email protected]> >>> > >> wrote: >>> > >> >>> > >> Hi Edgar, >>> > >> >>> > >> Thanks for your great contribution. I just would like to clarify >>> why do >>> > >> we have 9 routers + 3 2621 Backbone >>> > >> INE is just 6 Router + 3 Backbones that gives total of 9 routers >>> all. >>> > >> >>> > >> Hahaha It got me confused now , Now I don't know which is better >>> > topology >>> > >> IPX or INE? >>> > >> I know that owners here may get mad at me because I mentioned INE >>> but in >>> > >> all cases I am not promoting them or market their product so I >>> should be >>> > >> fine:). >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> On 7 October 2013 17:35, Edgar Mauricio Diaz Orellana < >>> > >> [email protected]> wrote: >>> > >> >>> > >>> as in ipexpert lab workbooks, you need >>> > >>> >>> > >>> 1x26x1xm router (Access Server) >>> > >>> 3x26x1xm routers (BACK BONE) >>> > >>> >>> > >>> 4xCAT3560-24TS-S >>> > >>> >>> > >>> 7x2811 Routers >>> > >>> 1x3825/3845 Router >>> > >>> 1x2611/2800 series with almost 1 NM Slot/3620/3640/3660 as Frame >>> relay >>> > >>> switch (R3) >>> > >>> 1x2801 Router as R9 >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> if you like to play with udld you need 2xSFP-SX-MM with a multimode >>> > >>> lc-lc patch to connect between CAT1 to R2 (gig0/1-Gig0/1) >>> > >>> >>> > >>> that's my contribution! >>> > >>> >>> > >>> best regards.! >>> > >>> >>> > >>> Edgar >>> > >>> Still #unnumbered! >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem < >>> > >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> >>> > >>>> The training vendors usually are very close to the real lab as >>> well. >>> > >>>> I used INE for Voice stuff and all the equipment and modules are >>> same >>> > as >>> > >>>> the real lab the only difference was the routers itself. >>> > >>>> I am not intending to breach NDA or asking for the exam content >>> itself >>> > >>>> such >>> > >>>> as questions , answers , usernames , ip addresses or passwords >>> but the >>> > >>>> thing is the Blueprint is not clear at all about the modules. >>> > >>>> In the Voice track blueprint it was more clear about the T1/E1 >>> modules >>> > >>>> needs to be used in the test but in R/S scenario they just give a >>> very >>> > >>>> little information. >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> On 7 October 2013 12:37, Bob McCouch <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> > Pick the topology for the training vendor you're using and >>> build to >>> > >>>> that. >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> > The exact topology and models in use in the real lab are not >>> > >>>> published in >>> > >>>> > their entirety. If someone gives you an exact list for the real >>> lab, >>> > >>>> > they're lying or violating NDA. >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem < >>> > >>>> > [email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> >> Dear Experts, >>> > >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> I just would like to know the CCE R/S V4 Lab Equipment >>> > >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> I know for fact if I am not mistaken it should be >>> > >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> 6X CISCO 1841 Routers >>> > >>>> >> 3X CISCO 3825 Routers for Backbone >>> > >>>> >> 4X Catalyst 3560 Switches 3560-24TS-S >>> > >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> I already read this link >>> > >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >>> > >>> http://www.ine.com/downloads/routing_switching_rack_rental_hardware_specification_v1.2.pdf >>> > >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> But I would like to make the lab as close to the real V4 lab as >>> > much >>> > >>>> as >>> > >>>> >> possible for better and speedy strategy. >>> > >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> I would like to know in detail how many WIC-1T should be >>> installed >>> > >>>> and how >>> > >>>> >> about the Backbone do they use WIC-1T or NM-4A/S >>> > >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> I am just newbie but it would be good to start build the lab >>> as it >>> > >>>> will >>> > >>>> >> ease the studies. >>> > >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> Many Thanks, >>> > >>>> >> Hesham >>> > >>>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> > >>>> >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab >>> training, >>> > >>>> please >>> > >>>> >> visit www.ipexpert.com >>> > >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>> > >>>> >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>> > >>>> >> >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ >>> > >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>> > >>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>> > >>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>> > >>>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >> >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> > ------------------------------ >>> > >>> > Message: 4 >>> > Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 20:49:02 -0700 >>> > From: Hesham Abdelkereem <[email protected]> >>> > To: Edgar Mauricio Diaz Orellana <[email protected]> >>> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIE R/S Lab Equipment List >>> > Message-ID: >>> > < >>> > caa-uhvebewj_+qweowpdcvpgs4ph5-pryjpi0317dgeypvn...@mail.gmail.com> >>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >>> > >>> > I got the magic number but not R/S its Voice :) >>> > Now I'm trying to purse the R/S track. Actually the main purpose >>> behind it >>> > is to learn the technology in depth and not the certification to be >>> honest >>> > with you. >>> > Many people can get it without any knowledge and that workbooks that >>> has >>> > the real labs are available and many people just memorize it but thats >>> not >>> > me. >>> > I can't memorize anything at all , I have a very bad memory. If I was a >>> > memorizer , I would always get A+ in my academic life at the university >>> > previously and I never got A+ once in my life:). >>> > >>> > I can tell u with confidence back in 2010 I got a colleague who doesn't >>> > know what is the core layers of switching , STP , VTP , Multicast , >>> IGMP >>> > and etc. and 1 year and half later he is CCIE R/S. I am serious and I >>> > worked with that guy directly and my judgement was based on his work >>> when >>> > he configured the switches. >>> > He configured the switches and he doesn't know whats is the core >>> switch , >>> > distribution layer and edge layer . I found all switches has default >>> > priority and didnt even connect the switches properly and there was an >>> IPTV >>> > system in place and didn't configure IGMP immediate leave on edge and >>> IGMP >>> > querier on the core. >>> > Even he doesn't know whats the difference between STP , RSTP MST and >>> etc.. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On 7 October 2013 20:34, Edgar Mauricio Diaz Orellana < >>> > [email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > > Hi hesham. >>> > > >>> > > as i found... in my development of network engineer... the lab is >>> just a >>> > > preparation of what you could found in the real world... even some >>> labs >>> > are >>> > > so difficult and messy than appears to be a real working environment. >>> > > >>> > > i had some friends within i exchange some experience and point of >>> view of >>> > > some problems, we had some brain storming together and found another >>> view >>> > > of some problem or solution for a defined problem.. >>> > > >>> > > good friends are the best way to aprove an exam or pass the lab. >>> > > >>> > > and don't worry, if you don't cheat to get your magic number, then >>> you'll >>> > > improve so damn good, than if someone just figureout asking about >>> what >>> > is a >>> > > shamlink you could answer even with the RFC with what chapter and >>> what >>> > line >>> > > in that chapter talks about this feature on the OSPF protocol. >>> > > >>> > > PS: For those are wondering what is a sham link just check RFC 4577 >>> > OSPFv2 >>> > > and go to chapter 4.2.7. >>> > > >>> > > best regards. >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > Edgar >>> > > Still #unnumbered >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem < >>> > > [email protected]> wrote: >>> > > >>> > >> Any opinion should be respected even if its against IPX:) its free >>> of >>> > >> speech and we don't make any bad talks about anyone. >>> > >> We are not in jail here:) we can speak any say our opinion freeily. >>> > >> >>> > >> Thanks brother have you ever made any attempts? >>> > >> I wish you all success. >>> > >> I am CCNA and NP routing and switching but I dont have extensive >>> > hands-on >>> > >> experience on routing , IPV6 , BGP , MPLS , OSPF and that stuff. >>> > >> >>> > >> Thanks, >>> > >> Hesham >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> On 7 October 2013 18:55, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >> >>> > >>> Hi again. >>> > >>> >>> > >>> We'll in my humble opinion, I preffer kick ass IPExpert workbooks >>> for >>> > >>> over IN* ones. >>> > >>> >>> > >>> Why? simple... >>> > >>> >>> > >>> Technology focus over and over again in the IPExpert wb, on the >>> other >>> > >>> vendor the deployment of the workbook is just confuse ... >>> > >>> >>> > >>> Again is my humble opinion >>> > >>> >>> > >>> Best regards >>> > >>> >>> > >>> Edgar >>> > >>> >>> > >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> > >>> >>> > >>> On 07-10-2013, at 21:41, Hesham Abdelkereem < >>> [email protected]> >>> > >>> wrote: >>> > >>> >>> > >>> Hi Edgar, >>> > >>> >>> > >>> Thanks for your great contribution. I just would like to clarify >>> why do >>> > >>> we have 9 routers + 3 2621 Backbone >>> > >>> INE is just 6 Router + 3 Backbones that gives total of 9 routers >>> all. >>> > >>> >>> > >>> Hahaha It got me confused now , Now I don't know which is better >>> > >>> topology IPX or INE? >>> > >>> I know that owners here may get mad at me because I mentioned INE >>> but >>> > in >>> > >>> all cases I am not promoting them or market their product so I >>> should >>> > be >>> > >>> fine:). >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> On 7 October 2013 17:35, Edgar Mauricio Diaz Orellana < >>> > >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> >>> > >>>> as in ipexpert lab workbooks, you need >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> 1x26x1xm router (Access Server) >>> > >>>> 3x26x1xm routers (BACK BONE) >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> 4xCAT3560-24TS-S >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> 7x2811 Routers >>> > >>>> 1x3825/3845 Router >>> > >>>> 1x2611/2800 series with almost 1 NM Slot/3620/3640/3660 as Frame >>> relay >>> > >>>> switch (R3) >>> > >>>> 1x2801 Router as R9 >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> if you like to play with udld you need 2xSFP-SX-MM with a >>> multimode >>> > >>>> lc-lc patch to connect between CAT1 to R2 (gig0/1-Gig0/1) >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> that's my contribution! >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> best regards.! >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> Edgar >>> > >>>> Still #unnumbered! >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem < >>> > >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>>> The training vendors usually are very close to the real lab as >>> well. >>> > >>>>> I used INE for Voice stuff and all the equipment and modules are >>> same >>> > >>>>> as >>> > >>>>> the real lab the only difference was the routers itself. >>> > >>>>> I am not intending to breach NDA or asking for the exam content >>> > itself >>> > >>>>> such >>> > >>>>> as questions , answers , usernames , ip addresses or passwords >>> but >>> > the >>> > >>>>> thing is the Blueprint is not clear at all about the modules. >>> > >>>>> In the Voice track blueprint it was more clear about the T1/E1 >>> > modules >>> > >>>>> needs to be used in the test but in R/S scenario they just give a >>> > very >>> > >>>>> little information. >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> On 7 October 2013 12:37, Bob McCouch <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> > Pick the topology for the training vendor you're using and >>> build to >>> > >>>>> that. >>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>>>> > The exact topology and models in use in the real lab are not >>> > >>>>> published in >>> > >>>>> > their entirety. If someone gives you an exact list for the real >>> > lab, >>> > >>>>> > they're lying or violating NDA. >>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>>>> > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem < >>> > >>>>> > [email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>>>> >> Dear Experts, >>> > >>>>> >> >>> > >>>>> >> >>> > >>>>> >> I just would like to know the CCE R/S V4 Lab Equipment >>> > >>>>> >> >>> > >>>>> >> I know for fact if I am not mistaken it should be >>> > >>>>> >> >>> > >>>>> >> 6X CISCO 1841 Routers >>> > >>>>> >> 3X CISCO 3825 Routers for Backbone >>> > >>>>> >> 4X Catalyst 3560 Switches 3560-24TS-S >>> > >>>>> >> >>> > >>>>> >> I already read this link >>> > >>>>> >> >>> > >>>>> >> >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>> http://www.ine.com/downloads/routing_switching_rack_rental_hardware_specification_v1.2.pdf >>> > >>>>> >> >>> > >>>>> >> But I would like to make the lab as close to the real V4 lab >>> as >>> > >>>>> much as >>> > >>>>> >> possible for better and speedy strategy. >>> > >>>>> >> >>> > >>>>> >> I would like to know in detail how many WIC-1T should be >>> installed >>> > >>>>> and how >>> > >>>>> >> about the Backbone do they use WIC-1T or NM-4A/S >>> > >>>>> >> >>> > >>>>> >> I am just newbie but it would be good to start build the lab >>> as it >>> > >>>>> will >>> > >>>>> >> ease the studies. >>> > >>>>> >> >>> > >>>>> >> Many Thanks, >>> > >>>>> >> Hesham >>> > >>>>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> > >>>>> >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab >>> training, >>> > >>>>> please >>> > >>>>> >> visit www.ipexpert.com >>> > >>>>> >> >>> > >>>>> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>> > >>>>> >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >>> > >>>>> >> >>> > >>>>> >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>> > >>>>> >> >>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>> > >>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab >>> training, >>> > >>>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>> > >>>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > >>> >>> > >> >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> > End of CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 93, Issue 8 >>> > ************************************** >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>> >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >>> >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
