I made a typo 2 emails ago... If you are doing a police statement that is going into a service policy that will be applied to an interface, use either police or police* rate (SHOULD BE POLICE CIR)* depending on the throughput and the be/bc values. sorry for the confusion.
V/r, Ryan Krcelic On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Ryan Krcelic <[email protected]>wrote: > Again, if you are using CoPP (applying the service policy to the control > plane) then you would use police rate. > > Try not to over think the answer. If the question says to limit to 75k > then just use police. If they say to limit with specific burst values to > conforming and exceeding values, use police cir. > > It definately matters if you use police or police rate. I'm pretty sure > that if you use police rate in the PM and then try to apply it to an > interface you will get an error. > > V/r, > > Ryan Krcelic > > > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Joe Schulte <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Okay, but I gave you the exact specs. Limit it to 750k. End of >> requirement. >> >> Police, police rate, or doesn't matter? >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Oct 16, 2013, at 11:19 AM, Ryan Krcelic <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> The biggest thing to know is that the police rate command is used with >> CoPP. If you are just policing you have to choose between 1 bucket or 2 >> bucket. Police xxx is 1 bucket and police cir xxx is 2 bucket. >> >> If you are doing a police statement that is going into a service policy >> that will be applied to an interface, use either police or police rate >> depending on the throughput and the be/bc values. >> V/r, >> >> Ryan Krcelic >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Joe S <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Gaah....class-map match-any FTP >>> >>> Nobody needs to correct me on that part! >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Joe S <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > I appreciate the feedback, and if I'd asked my question more clearly >>> maybe >>> > it would have been a bit better. >>> > >>> > The only stipulation in the lab was "Limit FTP traffic to 750Kbps". >>> > >>> > So in my answer I just did: >>> > class-map FTP >>> > match protocol secure-ftp >>> > match protocol ftp >>> > policy-map LIMIT >>> > class FTP >>> > police 750000 >>> > >>> > Meanwhile, the book solution was the exact same thing except their >>> police >>> > statement was: >>> > police rate 750000 >>> > >>> > It's a difficult set of stuff to search for, too, because a word like >>> > "rate" tends to show up on all the same pages as "police" anyway... >>> > >>> > >>> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Tony Singh <[email protected] >>> >wrote: >>> > >>> >> >>> >> Joe >>> >> >>> >> Here's some of my notes, read the RFC's below for a deeper >>> understanding. >>> >> >>> >> Single Rate Two Color Policer (One Bucket) >>> >> >>> >> police 96 bc x be x >>> >> confirm action >>> >> exced action >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Single Rate Three Color Policer (Two Buckets) [srTCM RFC 2697] >>> >> >>> >> police cir x bc x be x >>> >> confirm action >>> >> exceed action >>> >> violate action >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Two Rate Three Color Policer (Two Buckets) [trTCM RFC 2698] >>> >> >>> >> Here you define CIR and PIR >>> >> >>> >> police rate (cir) x (pir) x >>> >> confirm action >>> >> exceed action >>> >> violate action >>> >> >>> >> The buckets by definition are either conform=one and conform and >>> >> violate=two >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> BR >>> >> >>> >> Tony >>> >> >>> >> Sent from my iPhone on 3 >>> >> >>> >> > On 16 Oct 2013, at 15:38, Joe S <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> > As I continue through I find another difference between my solution >>> and >>> >> the >>> >> > DSG's solution. And I'm having trouble finding an answer online. >>> >> > >>> >> > In a policy map, what is the difference between a "police" command >>> and a >>> >> > "police rate" command? >>> >> > _______________________________________________ >>> >> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>> >> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>> >> > >>> >> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>> >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >>> >> > >>> >> > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>> >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >>> >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
