Mark, I see your lets say Super-Hint is valid, but you mentioned that there are multiple ways to achieve the same. I would like to find one where just CCM and UNITY be involved, avoiding to use IPCC Scripting because is too time consuming to be applied in the Exam, besides it would be dependant of the IPCC be working correctly (I have the impression most of the people dont make work the IPCC in their first attempts)
thankful of your wise guidance. -----Original Message----- From: Mark Snow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 5/14/2008 4:29 PM To: Christian Narvaez Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity 4.0(5) - VM Selection Foward the call to 7xxxx where xxxx is the other VM Box you want it to hit (for this example maybe 2001). 7xxxx (literally just 7xxxx) is the trigger for a UCCX application that preserves whatever 'xxxx' was in a variable (in this case 2001). Then a new number is formed to make it like "#" + "xxxx-variable" so the new number is "#2001". Then forward #2001 back to the UCM where it matches a CTI RP that is "#xxxx" and FwdsAll to VM with a New VMProfile that has only the mask XXXX (so it strips the #) - then it forwards properly into the correct Subscriber box. Sorry - got to typing and didn't really give a hint - gave the answer - sometimes I get carried away in thinking up a way to solve it that I forgo the fishing lesson for the fish :) Ah well - next time perhaps. -- Mark Snow CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security) CCSI #31583 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.309.413.4097 Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Join our free online support and peer group communities: http://www.IPexpert.com/communities -- IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On- Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications. -- On May 14, 2008, at 4:22 PM, Christian Narvaez wrote: > I agree with you that stuff about fishing :). Actually now I am > stuck trying to get around how to manipulate the "Redirect Number" > in Callmanager, never done that before (What I have seen is just > manipulations of called and calling number). And trying to figure > out what kind of "variables" you meant for that. Hmmmm, maybe > another hint would not be so bad to learn fish a barracuda like > this :) > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Snow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wed 5/14/2008 4:03 PM > To: Christian Narvaez > Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity 4.0(5) - VM Selection > > If that wasn't enough of a hint - let me know - I will be happy to > give you a bit more of a hint of HOW to do it in UCCX - but I am one > of those that is of the mindset of teaching people to fish - if you > get the euphemism :) > > -- > Mark Snow > CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security) > CCSI #31583 > > Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. > > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 > Fax: +1.309.413.4097 > Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- > Join our free online support and peer group communities: > http://www.IPexpert.com/communities > -- > IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On- > Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S > Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and > CCIE Storage Lab Certifications. > -- > > On May 14, 2008, at 3:48 PM, Christian Narvaez wrote: > > > Thanks Mark for the clarification !, any little clue how to resolve > > it would be nice :) . I take the rest. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Mark Snow > > Sent: Wed 5/14/2008 2:24 PM > > To: Christian Narvaez > > Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity 4.0(5) - VM Selection > > > > Christian - the problem you are running into is an old one and it > > would be nice if Unity 4.0.5 supported something differently - but > > alas - it does not. That functionality is hard-coded into the Unity > > TSP driver - with no selectable option to change it. You will have > to > > find another way around it - keep looking and try to think of it > from > > another angle! > > > > -- > > Mark Snow > > CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security) > > CCSI #31583 > > > > Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. > > > > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 > > Fax: +1.309.413.4097 > > Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > > Join our free online support and peer group communities: > > http://www.IPexpert.com/communities > > -- > > IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video- > On- > > Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S > > Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab > and > > CCIE Storage Lab Certifications. > > -- > > > > On May 14, 2008, at 12:07 PM, Christian Narvaez wrote: > > > > > What I am trying to do is the following : Make that any extension > > > can press Forward All and "7" + 4-digit extension, in order to the > > > calls directed to its phone be redirected to someone else voice > > > mailbox. For instance , if my phone is 2010, and I "Forward All" > to > > > "71001", someone calling me to 2010 should hear the 1001 > VoiceMail. > > > > > > Actually I am using an CTI RP with "7xxxx" and Voicemail Profile > > > with mask "xxxx" to redirect to Unity. The problem I am having: > I am > > > forwarding all to 71001, when someone calls to 2010, the VM of > 2010 > > > is heard, and not the 1001 VM, because the Unity select the > mailbox > > > based on the ORIGINAL REDIRECTING NUMBER (the phone 2010), and not > > > the LAST REDIRECTING NUMBER (The CTI_RP 7xxxx) > > > > > > Any Ideas how to resolve this issue? > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of > Christian > > > Narvaez > > > Sent: Wed 5/14/2008 11:01 AM > > > To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > > > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity 4.0(5) - VM Selection > > > > > > Guys, > > > Does anybody know how is possible that Unity 4.0(5) select the > > > voicemail based on the "Last Redirected Number" and not on the > > > "Original Redirecting Number" as is by default > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
