Hi, it is a home lab, I can restrict name and number with configuring CME to to that but when it comes to ccm, it wouldn't kick in.
So I think problem lies in ccm part. Jeremy On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:08 AM, Christian Hennrich < christian.hennr...@intact-is.com> wrote: > Hi, > > if you have clid and calling name restricted, then it is normally send to > the ISDN and one flag, I do not know which one exactly, in the Q.931 Message > tells, that the Name needs to get stripped on the last ISDN Switch, before > delivery. > > One Question does this issue occurs on proctorlabs or any other rented lab? > Or is it a problem of your "home lab" > > Have a look at: > > http://cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/voice/command/reference/vr_c6.html#wp1131255 > > > Cheers > > > jeremy co schrieb: > >> Hi Michael, >> >> I can see it in both alerting and connected. >> >> >> cheers >> Jeremy >> >> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Michael Thompson >> <mthompson...@gmail.com<mailto: >> mthompson...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Good test mechanism… >> >> >> Jeremy, do you show 2001 while it's alerting, after connection, or >> both? >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> *From:* anil batra [mailto:anil...@yahoo.com >> <mailto:anil...@yahoo.com>] >> *Sent:* Saturday, January 10, 2009 10:00 PM >> *To:* Michael Thompson; jeremy co >> >> *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com >> <mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> >> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] calling number passed to pstn >> although itset to restricted >> >> >> Did you try using TP insated of RP. I mean create a TP 9[2-9]XXXXXX >> and restrict name and number there and then check... >> >> --- On *Sun, 1/11/09, jeremy co /<jeremy.coo...@gmail.com >> <mailto:jeremy.coo...@gmail.com>>/* wrote: >> >> From: jeremy co <jeremy.coo...@gmail.com >> <mailto:jeremy.coo...@gmail.com>> >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] calling number passed to pstn >> although itset to restricted >> To: "Michael Thompson" <mthompson...@gmail.com >> <mailto:mthompson...@gmail.com>> >> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com >> <mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> >> >> Date: Sunday, January 11, 2009, 8:17 AM >> >> Thanx Michael, >> >> >> scenario is : >> >> ipphone---ccm------ GW(MGCP) ---PSTN ------PSTN_Phone >> >> >> Well it should show up in pstn phone. >> Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2 >> Standard = CCITT >> Transfer Capability = Speech >> Transfer Mode = Circuit >> Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s >> Channel ID i = 0xA98383 >> Exclusive, Channel 3 >> Calling Party Number i = 0x0081, '2001' >> Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown >> Called Party Number i = 0x80, '0111234' >> Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown >> Mar 11 16:26:42.989: ISDN Se0/0:23 Q931: RX <- CALL_PROC pd = 8 >> callref = 0x8003 >> Channel ID i = 0xA98383 >> Exclusive, Channel 3 >> >> I cannot even see calling name as restricted , just it would not >> show p on pstn phone. >> >> but I can see 2001 on pstn phone. I want to restrict calling name >> and number for particular RP, so putting restrict on GW is not an >> option. >> >> Any idea? >> >> Regards, >> >> Jeremy >> >> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Michael Thompson >> <mthompson...@gmail.com <mailto:mthompson...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Is it actually showing up on the PSTN phone or do you just see it in >> the Q.931 debug. >> >> >> Technically, when you set CLID to restricted, the number still >> presents on the line. If the receiving side does not respect the >> restricted 'switch' setting, then the call can end up being >> displayed on the receiving phone. >> >> >> If you do the debug, do you see the calling party name as >> restricted? I'm assuming that this isn't on a 6608 port. >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com >> <mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com> >> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com >> <mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com>] *On Behalf Of >> *jeremy co >> *Sent:* Saturday, January 10, 2009 5:31 PM >> *To:* Sergio Polizer >> *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com >> <mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> >> >> >> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] calling number passed to pstn >> although itset to restricted >> >> >> Hi, >> >> Thanx, but in my scenario I want to restrict one particular RP, so I >> should allow on GW. I use MGCP GW. >> >> >> any idea How can I do this? >> >> >> Cheers >> >> Jeremy >> >> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 2:07 AM, Sergio Polizer >> <spoli...@hotmail.com <mailto:spoli...@hotmail.com>> wrote: >> >> I think that in this case it will block the CLID for all calls >> that are going out through this gw. >> If you keep the GW with CLID=default (not allowed) is just fine and >> your config at the RP to restrict the CLID will works. >> Sergio. >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> From: narinder.ku...@uxcg.com.au <mailto:narinder.ku...@uxcg.com.au> >> To: jeremy.coo...@gmail.com <mailto:jeremy.coo...@gmail.com>; >> ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com <mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> >> Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 22:26:23 +1100 >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] calling number passed to pstn >> although it set to restricted >> >> >> What kind of GW are you using MGCP or H323. >> >> Check the GW configuration on CCM the GW should also have the CLID >> and CNAME restricted. >> >> >> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com >> <mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com> >> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com >> <mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com>] *On Behalf Of >> *jeremy co >> *Sent:* Saturday, 10 January 2009 7:56 PM >> *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com >> <mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> >> >> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] calling number passed to pstn although >> it set to restricted >> >> >> Hi, >> >> I set >> >> calling line ID presentation Restricted >> calling name presentation Restricted >> >> on Route Pattern >> >> >> calling name is not show up but I can still see my DID phone number >> (2001) on pstn phone. >> >> it should not pass it to pstn, any idea why this happened? >> >> >> Jeremy >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> CONFIDENTIALITY - The information contained in this electronic mail >> message is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). >> If you are not an authorised recipient of this message please >> contact Getronics Australia immediately by reply email and >> destroy/delete this message from your computer. Any unauthorised >> form of reproduction of this message, or part thereof, is strictly >> prohibited. >> DISCLAIMER - Unless specifically indicated otherwise, the views and >> opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not >> Getronics Australia. While we endeavour to protect our network from >> computer viruses, Getronics Australia does not warrant that this >> email or any attachments are free of viruses or any other defects or >> errors. It is the duty of the recipient to virus scan and otherwise >> test any information contained in this email before loading onto any >> computer system. >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Notícias direto do New York Times, gols do Lance, videocassetadas e >> muitos outros vídeos no MSN Videos! Confira já! >> <http://video.msn.com/?mkt=pt-br> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ______________________________________________________________________ >> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. >> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email >> ______________________________________________________________________ >> >> ______________________________________________________________________ >> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. >> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email >> ______________________________________________________________________ >> >
