Jonathan
I'm sure this time you will passed:)
JoJo
> From: ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 43, Issue 5
> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 00:56:45 -0400
>
> Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
> ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Copying ESX machine images. (Mark Snow)
> 2. Re: Upgrade Firmware of Phones SCCP to SIP/SIP to SCCP
> (ccie8340tx)
> 3. V3 Attempt Two (Jonathan Charles)
> 4. Re: ESW phone port configuration - trunk or access?
> (Jonathan Charles)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 21:20:16 -0400
> From: Mark Snow <ms...@ipexpert.com>
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Copying ESX machine images.
> To: Scott ODonnell <scott.odonn...@gmail.com>
> Cc: OSL Group <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
> Message-ID: <5187744a-9ac7-48a0-b77b-2505e88b1...@ipexpert.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Try a solution called FastSCP from Veeam.com.
> Great copy solution.
>
> http://www.veeam.com/vmware-esxi-fastscp.html
>
>
> --
> Mark Snow
> CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security)
>
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
>
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Fax: +1.309.413.4097
> Mailto: ms...@ipexpert.com
> --
> Join our free online support and peer group communities:
> http://www.IPexpert.com/communities
> --
> IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On-
> Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S
> Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and
> CCIE Storage Lab Certifications.
> --
>
>
>
>
> On Aug 31, 2009, at 3:58 PM, Scott ODonnell wrote:
>
> > I'd like to make a duplicate of an ESXi based vmachine I have at
> > home and run it at work.
> >
> > Is it as simple as browsing the storage folder and downloading all
> > the files from the machine directory?
> > Provided my network adapter configuration is all the same between
> > the home and work ESXi server, should it just boot up?
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> > please visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20090901/c4051201/attachment-0001.htm
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 20:46:33 -0500
> From: "ccie8340tx" <ccie834...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Upgrade Firmware of Phones SCCP to
> SIP/SIP to SCCP
> To: "Michael Ciarfello" <mciarfe...@iplogic.com>, "Daryl Smith"
> <darylpsm...@gmail.com>, <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
> Message-ID: <552a844eb07648949a7e608123cba...@padhudell4500>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Michael,
>
> Depending on the IOS running CME, it could be an ugly excercise getting SIP
> and Skinny switch back and forth especially with 7960 phones. I agree this
> should eventually become bread and butter for Voice IEs but for newbies
> transitioning from RS to Voice, it is a nice drill getting all the rqd files
> etc.
>
> my 2c.
>
> Cheers,Padhu
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Michael Ciarfello
> To: Daryl Smith ; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 10:38 AM
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Upgrade Firmware of Phones SCCP to SIP/SIP to
> SCCP
>
>
> It's not on the blueprint to perform that task. It's also not not on the
> blueprint to perform that task.
>
> Gotta ask. Does it matter?
>
>
>
> If it's a time consuming task (it is) then I'm sure they will adjust the
> remaining questions for the time used. But you can be performing other tasks
> while the phones upgrade.
>
>
>
> I'm just confused by these types of questions because I think every CCIE
> should know how to upgrade firmware. If they ask it and it's worth 1, 2, 3, 4
> points then yahoo, free points. I'll upgrade other people's PODS for those
> points!! If they don't ask it, then yahoo. Next question.
>
>
>
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Daryl Smith
> Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 10:53 AM
> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Upgrade Firmware of Phones SCCP to SIP/SIP to SCCP
>
>
>
> We will be required in the lab to every upgrade firmware of phones or change
> the firmware of the phones from SCCP to SIP or SIP to SCCP.
>
> DPS
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20090901/6961309d/attachment-0001.htm
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 23:53:12 -0500
> From: Jonathan Charles <jonv...@gmail.com>
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3 Attempt Two
> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Message-ID:
> <5d093f9a0909012153m71dad415tba9660e9d14f8...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> OK, took v3 again in RTP today... finished 30 minutes early...
>
> Well, not really... what happened was that I was doing some last
> minute tweaking (just retesting stuff, cleaning up some config) and
> some key huge point items stopped working... I undid what I did to
> break stuff, got up and walked away... yes, there was 30 minutes on
> the table, but it could have been the death of me...
>
> Anyway, waiting on results.... I would like to claim optimism, as I
> studied the crap out of my shortcomings last time, but I have done
> this before where I walked out of a lab pretty confident to see zero
> on sections I thought I aced... to be honest, I am like 85% sure I
> failed again.
>
> As they all say, the test is fair, nothing out of left field, some
> surprises on what was on there and what wasn't... there are some
> sleazy traps, but if you have a clue, you will work around em pretty
> quick...
>
>
> Took the first one in SJ, took this one in RTP... so, I can compare...
>
> In SJ, the phones are nailed to the walls in the cubicle... in RTP,
> they are on the desk (so you can flip em over and look at em...)...
> not sure which I prefer... I kinda like throwing them at the wall...
> But then again, in SJ, Ben Ng is sitting 4 feet from you, so, no
> intimidation there...
>
> I saw the remnants of the old v2 labs sitting in RTP, still had phones
> and fax machines... looked abandoned...
>
> Everything else I could say would be NDA... so, guys, do what you
> always do, look for the flurry of questions on 'how do I...." in this
> group or as veiled customer issues on Puck....
>
> As a joke, here are the four questions I would ask:
>
> Why on this day are we limited on how we can dial? When on all other
> days we can dial however we want?
> Why on this day must we use frame-relay, when on all other days, all
> of our customers have MPLS?
> Why on this day are we running unpatched, basically beta-versions of
> CUCM, CUPS, CUCCX, when on other days we can install patches to get
> around bugs?
> Why on this day do I have to fly all the way to Raleigh and start the
> test at 7:15AM, when the guys who go to San Jose get to sleep in and
> take their test at 9:00?
>
>
>
>
>
> Jonathan
> If you are Jewish, those are funny.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 23:56:43 -0500
> From: Jonathan Charles <jonv...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ESW phone port configuration - trunk
> or access?
> To: Allen Su <yenlins...@hotmail.com>
> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com, Michael Ciarfello
> <mciarfe...@iplogic.com>
> Message-ID:
> <5d093f9a0909012156t23448fcct770312a2a393d...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
>
> It is a legacy config because it is an ancient piece of hardware.
>
> Those of us who have been doing this awhile see it for what it is... a
> Cisco 3524XL with only 4 ports.
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Allen Su<yenlins...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > Correct Aamir. The reason you need to put the data vlan as native vlan is
> > b/c usually frames from PC are not tagged, therefore it needs to be placed
> > in the native vlan of the trunk port.
> >
> > I actually don't agree that trunk port is the correct config; or I should
> > say trunk port is a legacy config method. ?This is from a Cisco software
> > developer for the ISR and HWICs - "vvid is a later feature on hwics, when
> > you configure both an access and voice vlan, the port actually behaves as
> > trunk port, so mode trunk cli becomes redundant. With vvids, you get some
> > qos benefits for ipphones."
> >
> > Vvid is the voice vlan ID. ?The above statement is in line with the config
> > guidelines of 3750/3560 that access+voice vlan is the new direction; trunk
> > is legacy.
> >
> > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3750/software/release/1
> > 2.2_35_se/configuration/guide/swvoip.html
> >
> > Voice VLAN Configuration Guidelines (12.2(35)SE)
> > These are the voice VLAN configuration guidelines:
> > ? You should configure voice VLAN on switch access ports; voice VLAN is not
> > supported on trunk ports. You can configure a voice VLAN only on Layer 2
> > ports.
> > Note: ?Voice VLAN is only supported on access ports and not on trunk ports,
> > even though the configuration is allowed.
> >
> > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3750/software/release/1
> > 2.2_50_se/configuration/guide/swvoip.html
> >
> > Voice VLAN Configuration Guidelines (12.2(50)SE)
> > These are the voice VLAN configuration guidelines:
> > ? Voice VLAN configuration is only supported on switch access ports; voice
> > VLAN configuration is not supported on trunk ports.You can configure a voice
> > VLAN only on Layer 2 ports.
> > Note: ?Trunk ports can carry any number of voice VLANs, similar to regular
> > VLANs. The configuration of voice VLANs is not required on trunk ports.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Aamir Panjwani [mailto:aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au]
> > Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 8:02 PM
> > To: Jonathan Charles; Michael Ciarfello
> > Cc: Allen Su; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> > Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ESW phone port configuration - trunk or
> > access?
> >
> > Ok so if me make a trunk port then we must use "native" keyword for data
> > vlan...is that correct?
> >
> > switchport mode trunk
> > switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
> > switchport trunk native vlan 100
> > switchport voice vlan 200
> > spanning-tree portfast
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jonathan Charles [mailto:jonv...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, 1 September 2009 12:10 PM
> > To: Michael Ciarfello
> > Cc: Aamir Panjwani; Allen Su; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ESW phone port configuration - trunk or
> > access?
> >
> > The ESW you are referring to is an NM that you have to session over to...
> >
> > I agree.... I am taking the lab in the morning, and I am making them trunks.
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Michael
> > Ciarfello<mciarfe...@iplogic.com> wrote:
> >> Make sure a PC attached to the back of a phone gets the proper data IP
> >> address.? Those ESW's are built upon 3524's which needed trunk.? *I* would
> >> configure trunk.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Some ESW's models are based on 3750's which you can only get into via a
> >> session command (like Unity express) so you know you would have one of
> >> those.? The ports don't show up in the router config.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
> >> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Aamir
> > Panjwani
> >> Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 2:21 AM
> >> To: Allen Su; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ESW phone port configuration - trunk or
> >> access?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Yes I am curious about this one as well...ipexpert uses trunk port for ESW
> >> module but trunk or access config both works fine as Allen said.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> If the lab requirement doesn't specifically ask to configure trunk port
> > then
> >> can we use either method or are there any issues that we need to be aware
> >> of?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
> >> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Allen Su
> >> Sent: Thursday, 27 August 2009 3:41 PM
> >> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> >> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ESW phone port configuration - trunk or
> > access?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi folks,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I have a question regarding the phone port configuration on ESW HWIC -
> >> should it be configured with trunk or access?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Trunk:
> >>
> >> 1.?????? IPexpert workbook section 1A/1B specifically indicated that the
> > ESW
> >> phone ports need to be configured as a trunk.
> >>
> >> 2.?????? The product FAQ said it needs to be configured as trunk
> >>
> > (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps5853/prod_qas0900aecd8
> > 016c026_ps5854_Products_Q_and_A_Item.html)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Access:
> >>
> >> 1.?????? Found another Cisco doc showing access port config
> >>
> > (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps2797/products_configuratio
> > n_example09186a00808066b8.shtml#step4)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Tested both in the lab and both seem to be working fine.? Phones can
> >> register with CME, can get DHCP, etc.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Did I miss anything?? Will anything not work if it is configured as access
> >> port?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks for your help,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Allen Su
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ______________________________________________________________________
> >> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> >> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> >> ______________________________________________________________________
> >>
> >> ______________________________________________________________________
> >> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> >> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> >> ______________________________________________________________________
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> >> visit www.ipexpert.com
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> >
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> CCIE_Voice mailing list
> CCIE_Voice@onlinestudylist.com
> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
>
>
> End of CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 43, Issue 5
> *****************************************
_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live: Make it easier for your friends to see what you’re up to on
Facebook.
http://windowslive.com/Campaign/SocialNetworking?ocid=PID23285::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:SI_SB_facebook:082009
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
