You were right

On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 12:48 AM, JoJo JoJo<barre...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Jonathan
> I'm sure this time you will passed:)
>
> JoJo
>
>
>> From: ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
>> Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 43, Issue 5
>> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 00:56:45 -0400
>>
>> Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
>> ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. Re: Copying ESX machine images. (Mark Snow)
>> 2. Re: Upgrade Firmware of Phones SCCP to SIP/SIP to SCCP
>> (ccie8340tx)
>> 3. V3 Attempt Two (Jonathan Charles)
>> 4. Re: ESW phone port configuration - trunk or access?
>> (Jonathan Charles)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 21:20:16 -0400
>> From: Mark Snow <ms...@ipexpert.com>
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Copying ESX machine images.
>> To: Scott ODonnell <scott.odonn...@gmail.com>
>> Cc: OSL Group <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
>> Message-ID: <5187744a-9ac7-48a0-b77b-2505e88b1...@ipexpert.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>
>> Try a solution called FastSCP from Veeam.com.
>> Great copy solution.
>>
>> http://www.veeam.com/vmware-esxi-fastscp.html
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mark Snow
>> CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security)
>>
>> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
>>
>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
>> Fax: +1.309.413.4097
>> Mailto: ms...@ipexpert.com
>> --
>> Join our free online support and peer group communities:
>> http://www.IPexpert.com/communities
>> --
>> IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On-
>> Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S
>> Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and
>> CCIE Storage Lab Certifications.
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Aug 31, 2009, at 3:58 PM, Scott ODonnell wrote:
>>
>> > I'd like to make a duplicate of an ESXi based vmachine I have at
>> > home and run it at work.
>> >
>> > Is it as simple as browsing the storage folder and downloading all
>> > the files from the machine directory?
>> > Provided my network adapter configuration is all the same between
>> > the home and work ESXi server, should it just boot up?
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> > please visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20090901/c4051201/attachment-0001.htm
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 20:46:33 -0500
>> From: "ccie8340tx" <ccie834...@gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Upgrade Firmware of Phones SCCP to
>> SIP/SIP to SCCP
>> To: "Michael Ciarfello" <mciarfe...@iplogic.com>, "Daryl Smith"
>> <darylpsm...@gmail.com>, <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
>> Message-ID: <552a844eb07648949a7e608123cba...@padhudell4500>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> Michael,
>>
>> Depending on the IOS running CME, it could be an ugly excercise getting
>> SIP and Skinny switch back and forth especially with 7960 phones. I agree
>> this should eventually become bread and butter for Voice IEs but for newbies
>> transitioning from RS to Voice, it is a nice drill getting all the rqd files
>> etc.
>>
>> my 2c.
>>
>> Cheers,Padhu
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Michael Ciarfello
>> To: Daryl Smith ; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 10:38 AM
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Upgrade Firmware of Phones SCCP to SIP/SIP
>> to SCCP
>>
>>
>> It's not on the blueprint to perform that task. It's also not not on the
>> blueprint to perform that task.
>>
>> Gotta ask. Does it matter?
>>
>>
>>
>> If it's a time consuming task (it is) then I'm sure they will adjust the
>> remaining questions for the time used. But you can be performing other tasks
>> while the phones upgrade.
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm just confused by these types of questions because I think every CCIE
>> should know how to upgrade firmware. If they ask it and it's worth 1, 2, 3,
>> 4 points then yahoo, free points. I'll upgrade other people's PODS for those
>> points!! If they don't ask it, then yahoo. Next question.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
>> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Daryl Smith
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 10:53 AM
>> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Upgrade Firmware of Phones SCCP to SIP/SIP to
>> SCCP
>>
>>
>>
>> We will be required in the lab to every upgrade firmware of phones or
>> change the firmware of the phones from SCCP to SIP or SIP to SCCP.
>>
>> DPS
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20090901/6961309d/attachment-0001.htm
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 3
>> Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 23:53:12 -0500
>> From: Jonathan Charles <jonv...@gmail.com>
>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3 Attempt Two
>> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> Message-ID:
>> <5d093f9a0909012153m71dad415tba9660e9d14f8...@mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>
>> OK, took v3 again in RTP today... finished 30 minutes early...
>>
>> Well, not really... what happened was that I was doing some last
>> minute tweaking (just retesting stuff, cleaning up some config) and
>> some key huge point items stopped working... I undid what I did to
>> break stuff, got up and walked away... yes, there was 30 minutes on
>> the table, but it could have been the death of me...
>>
>> Anyway, waiting on results.... I would like to claim optimism, as I
>> studied the crap out of my shortcomings last time, but I have done
>> this before where I walked out of a lab pretty confident to see zero
>> on sections I thought I aced... to be honest, I am like 85% sure I
>> failed again.
>>
>> As they all say, the test is fair, nothing out of left field, some
>> surprises on what was on there and what wasn't... there are some
>> sleazy traps, but if you have a clue, you will work around em pretty
>> quick...
>>
>>
>> Took the first one in SJ, took this one in RTP... so, I can compare...
>>
>> In SJ, the phones are nailed to the walls in the cubicle... in RTP,
>> they are on the desk (so you can flip em over and look at em...)...
>> not sure which I prefer... I kinda like throwing them at the wall...
>> But then again, in SJ, Ben Ng is sitting 4 feet from you, so, no
>> intimidation there...
>>
>> I saw the remnants of the old v2 labs sitting in RTP, still had phones
>> and fax machines... looked abandoned...
>>
>> Everything else I could say would be NDA... so, guys, do what you
>> always do, look for the flurry of questions on 'how do I...." in this
>> group or as veiled customer issues on Puck....
>>
>> As a joke, here are the four questions I would ask:
>>
>> Why on this day are we limited on how we can dial? When on all other
>> days we can dial however we want?
>> Why on this day must we use frame-relay, when on all other days, all
>> of our customers have MPLS?
>> Why on this day are we running unpatched, basically beta-versions of
>> CUCM, CUPS, CUCCX, when on other days we can install patches to get
>> around bugs?
>> Why on this day do I have to fly all the way to Raleigh and start the
>> test at 7:15AM, when the guys who go to San Jose get to sleep in and
>> take their test at 9:00?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Jonathan
>> If you are Jewish, those are funny.
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 4
>> Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 23:56:43 -0500
>> From: Jonathan Charles <jonv...@gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ESW phone port configuration - trunk
>> or access?
>> To: Allen Su <yenlins...@hotmail.com>
>> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com, Michael Ciarfello
>> <mciarfe...@iplogic.com>
>> Message-ID:
>> <5d093f9a0909012156t23448fcct770312a2a393d...@mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
>>
>> It is a legacy config because it is an ancient piece of hardware.
>>
>> Those of us who have been doing this awhile see it for what it is... a
>> Cisco 3524XL with only 4 ports.
>>
>>
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Allen Su<yenlins...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> > Correct Aamir. The reason you need to put the data vlan as native vlan
>> > is
>> > b/c usually frames from PC are not tagged, therefore it needs to be
>> > placed
>> > in the native vlan of the trunk port.
>> >
>> > I actually don't agree that trunk port is the correct config; or I
>> > should
>> > say trunk port is a legacy config method. ?This is from a Cisco software
>> > developer for the ISR and HWICs - "vvid is a later feature on hwics,
>> > when
>> > you configure both an access and voice vlan, the port actually behaves
>> > as
>> > trunk port, so mode trunk cli becomes redundant. With vvids, you get
>> > some
>> > qos benefits for ipphones."
>> >
>> > Vvid is the voice vlan ID. ?The above statement is in line with the
>> > config
>> > guidelines of 3750/3560 that access+voice vlan is the new direction;
>> > trunk
>> > is legacy.
>> >
>> >
>> > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3750/software/release/1
>> > 2.2_35_se/configuration/guide/swvoip.html
>> >
>> > Voice VLAN Configuration Guidelines (12.2(35)SE)
>> > These are the voice VLAN configuration guidelines:
>> > ? You should configure voice VLAN on switch access ports; voice VLAN is
>> > not
>> > supported on trunk ports. You can configure a voice VLAN only on Layer 2
>> > ports.
>> > Note: ?Voice VLAN is only supported on access ports and not on trunk
>> > ports,
>> > even though the configuration is allowed.
>> >
>> >
>> > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3750/software/release/1
>> > 2.2_50_se/configuration/guide/swvoip.html
>> >
>> > Voice VLAN Configuration Guidelines (12.2(50)SE)
>> > These are the voice VLAN configuration guidelines:
>> > ? Voice VLAN configuration is only supported on switch access ports;
>> > voice
>> > VLAN configuration is not supported on trunk ports.You can configure a
>> > voice
>> > VLAN only on Layer 2 ports.
>> > Note: ?Trunk ports can carry any number of voice VLANs, similar to
>> > regular
>> > VLANs. The configuration of voice VLANs is not required on trunk ports.
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Aamir Panjwani [mailto:aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au]
>> > Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 8:02 PM
>> > To: Jonathan Charles; Michael Ciarfello
>> > Cc: Allen Su; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> > Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ESW phone port configuration - trunk or
>> > access?
>> >
>> > Ok so if me make a trunk port then we must use "native" keyword for data
>> > vlan...is that correct?
>> >
>> > switchport mode trunk
>> > switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
>> > switchport trunk native vlan 100
>> > switchport voice vlan 200
>> > spanning-tree portfast
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Jonathan Charles [mailto:jonv...@gmail.com]
>> > Sent: Tuesday, 1 September 2009 12:10 PM
>> > To: Michael Ciarfello
>> > Cc: Aamir Panjwani; Allen Su; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ESW phone port configuration - trunk or
>> > access?
>> >
>> > The ESW you are referring to is an NM that you have to session over
>> > to...
>> >
>> > I agree.... I am taking the lab in the morning, and I am making them
>> > trunks.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Michael
>> > Ciarfello<mciarfe...@iplogic.com> wrote:
>> >> Make sure a PC attached to the back of a phone gets the proper data IP
>> >> address.? Those ESW's are built upon 3524's which needed trunk.? *I*
>> >> would
>> >> configure trunk.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Some ESW's models are based on 3750's which you can only get into via a
>> >> session command (like Unity express) so you know you would have one of
>> >> those.? The ports don't show up in the router config.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
>> >> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Aamir
>> > Panjwani
>> >> Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 2:21 AM
>> >> To: Allen Su; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ESW phone port configuration - trunk or
>> >> access?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Yes I am curious about this one as well...ipexpert uses trunk port for
>> >> ESW
>> >> module but trunk or access config both works fine as Allen said.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> If the lab requirement doesn't specifically ask to configure trunk port
>> > then
>> >> can we use either method or are there any issues that we need to be
>> >> aware
>> >> of?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Thanks
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
>> >> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Allen Su
>> >> Sent: Thursday, 27 August 2009 3:41 PM
>> >> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> >> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ESW phone port configuration - trunk or
>> > access?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Hi folks,
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I have a question regarding the phone port configuration on ESW HWIC -
>> >> should it be configured with trunk or access?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Trunk:
>> >>
>> >> 1.?????? IPexpert workbook section 1A/1B specifically indicated that
>> >> the
>> > ESW
>> >> phone ports need to be configured as a trunk.
>> >>
>> >> 2.?????? The product FAQ said it needs to be configured as trunk
>> >>
>> >
>> > (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps5853/prod_qas0900aecd8
>> > 016c026_ps5854_Products_Q_and_A_Item.html)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Access:
>> >>
>> >> 1.?????? Found another Cisco doc showing access port config
>> >>
>> >
>> > (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps2797/products_configuratio
>> > n_example09186a00808066b8.shtml#step4)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Tested both in the lab and both seem to be working fine.? Phones can
>> >> register with CME, can get DHCP, etc.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Did I miss anything?? Will anything not work if it is configured as
>> >> access
>> >> port?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for your help,
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Allen Su
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ______________________________________________________________________
>> >> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
>> >> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
>> >> ______________________________________________________________________
>> >>
>> >> ______________________________________________________________________
>> >> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
>> >> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
>> >> ______________________________________________________________________
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> >> please
>> >> visit www.ipexpert.com
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > ______________________________________________________________________
>> > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
>> > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
>> > ______________________________________________________________________
>> >
>> > ______________________________________________________________________
>> > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
>> > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
>> > ______________________________________________________________________
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CCIE_Voice mailing list
>> CCIE_Voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
>>
>>
>> End of CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 43, Issue 5
>> *****************************************
>
> ________________________________
> Windows Live: Make it easier for your friends to see what you’re up to on
> Facebook. Find out more.
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to