This one is easy if you know how to utilize route-lists. I totally love the option of having setups like this at both routelist and routepattern level.
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Aamir Panjwani < aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au> wrote: > Thanks Dan, totally make sense.. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel Rodriguez [mailto:drodrig...@fidelus.com] > Sent: Saturday, 31 October 2009 12:52 PM > To: Aamir Panjwani; 'ciscod...@live.com'; 'mciarfe...@iplogic.com'; ' > ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com' > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calling Party Number Type > > You're correct - its from the perspective of the egress gateway. For > example, using IPExpert labs as a point of reference, calls from HQ Gw to > Spain would be international. That is, you pass the international access > code and country code to the PSTN with the called number type as > international. But that same call from the BR2 Gw would be considered a > local call, no international access code or country code and called party > type set to subscriber. It's easier to setup TEHO when you think "how would > I route this call if it was dialed locally?" - by locally I mean the from > the same location of the egress gateway. Hope that helps! > > - Dan > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com < > ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com> > To: Cisco Dave <ciscod...@live.com>; mciarfe...@iplogic.com < > mciarfe...@iplogic.com>; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com < > ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> > Sent: Fri Oct 30 21:33:08 2009 > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calling Party Number Type > > It’s easy to set calling/called party number type for calls going out local > gateway, however , I just wanted to confirm how it actually works in case of > backup gateway and teho > > > > Backup GW: Local call goes out HQ gateway calling/called number type set to > “subscriber”, if HQ GW goes down, the local call reroute via BR1 GW so in > this case it’s a long distance call from the perspective of BR1 GW so > called/called party number type should be set to “national” right? > > > > TEHO: If HQ user dial BR1 pstn number it should route via BR1 GW first, > now in this instance calling/called party type is “subscriber” from the BR1 > GW perspective, but “national” from the perspective of HQ user dialing..so > not sure which one is correct?? > > > > > I guess what I am getting at is when setting calling/called party number > type, do we look at from the perspective of user initiating the call or from > the perspective of the existing GW? > > > > I think it would be based on existing GW.... > > > > > > From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: > ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Cisco Dave > Sent: Tuesday, 27 October 2009 3:45 PM > To: mciarfe...@iplogic.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calling Party Number Type > > > > Thanks Michael, > I totally agree about asking the proctor, and so far they have been very > helpful whenever I had to ask them anything. > > I checked the SRND again and found the following. > > Page 10-17 > Gateway Calling Party Number Localization > +1415.XXXXXXX, strip pre-dot, numbering type: subscriber > +1.!. strip pre-dot, numbering type: national > > IPExpert Lab 5 also shows that when a call is made to an international > number that the calling number type should be set to international. > > This seems to indicate that the the calling number type coincide with the > called number type. > > Can anyone confirm this? > > Thanks, > cd > > > > ________________________________ > > From: mciarfe...@iplogic.com > To: ciscod...@live.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:13:04 -0400 > Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calling Party Number Type > > hmmm. I never cared enough to ask. I always ask what the carrier wants > (or get it off the paperwork) or just don't worry about it until callerID is > not showing up somewhere. Some don't seem to care what anything is set to. > Some need a specific type and plan in order to display your calling number > on the destination device. Then there is the crazy reality of your calling > number shows up properly on one provider's network and doesn't show up on > another provider's network. Then there's AT&T. humph. > > > > I would think if you set it to subscriber and your call ends up going > international, the carrier would (might) modify it. > > > > Couldn't find anything on Google, so ask your carrier. > > > > If this is a test question, I would think they would tell you what they > expect or ask the proctor. I'm guessing you were asking a real-life based > question. lol > > > > Take care > > ________________________________ > > From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [ > ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Cisco Dave [ > ciscod...@live.com] > Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 11:02 PM > To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calling Party Number Type > > Does anyone know of good information that details how the calling and > called number type should be set? > > For called party I would expect it to be very straight forward: > US > 7 or 10 digit dialing subscriber > 11 digit national > 011 International > > Non-US (may vary) > 8 digits - National > 00 - International > > Calling party number type on the other hand seems to be a bit more of a > mystery since it, at least in my mind, it is not dependent on the called > party (or is it?). > If I dial (US) a seven digit number (303-3333) that is understandably > marked as subscriber. But if I dial the same number as an 11 > (1714-303-3333) digit number is it still marked as subscriber? There are two > variations, I dial 1714-303-3333 and send those digits out to the PSTN, and > secondly I strip off the 1714 before sending out the PSTN. Should one or > both be set to calling party type of subscriber? > > So the calling party type scenarios are restated below for subscriber > calls: > A) 303-3333 > B) 1714-303-3333 > C) 1714-303-3333 (1714 stripped before sending to PSTN) > > I will lump both international and national calling number type into this > question. How does the calling number type get set in this situation? > Should it be set to national in both cases? Or does it change based on the > number called? > > Thank you, > cd > > > > ________________________________ > > Windows 7: Simplify your PC. Learn more. < > http://www.microsoft.com/Windows/windows-7/default.aspx?ocid=PID24727::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WWL_WIN_evergreen1:102009 > > > > > > ________________________________ > > Windows 7: I wanted more reliable, now it's more reliable. Wow! < > http://microsoft.com/windows/windows-7/default.aspx?h=myidea?ocid=PID24727::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WWL_WIN_myidea:102009 > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email > ______________________________________________________________________ > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email > ______________________________________________________________________ > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email > ______________________________________________________________________ > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
