Opps, the message bounce back due to the file size restriction. Gang, you may request the capture log file from me if you willing to help.
Thanks. Shingei. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: ShinGei Yong <[email protected]> Date: Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:02 PM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Failure of Adding subscriber-VM Server 2.0 To: Duy Nguyen <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Hi Bill, Regarding the VMWare setup, for VM Server 2.0, there are only two network mode available which are to "host" only and "bridge". For the ease of setup, i configured the network option for both nodes connected to host, so i can monitor the setup easily, other words, my machine is the "gateway" for both nodes. Both of them able to reach me through icmp ping and each other vice versa, no any "firewall" in between. Also, there is only a single 10.10.210.5 Pub server in VM network. Both nodes are assigned to the same VMnet interface. You may refer to the attached pic named "CUCM-PUB-SUB & RTMT Server connectivity" Hi Duy, IP was used throughout the entire setup, else the CUCM-PUB (10.10.210.5) ip address will not appear on the validation error screen. Also, from the jpg named CUCM-PUB-SUB, it shown that the IP address is assigned to PUB and SUB. Hi Pavan, Please find attached log files. As the VM node not connecting to a physical switch, i'm not sure can sniff the VMnet adapter interface. The environment doesn't contain a DNS server, i tried to reduce the complexity by not using DNS in IP network. Guys, i attached another 2 jpg which showing that i initiated the system validation from CUCM-Sub console while RTMT is ON and monitoring the process. Please take note on the timestamp on the WINXP machine, showing 20:55:46 which i started the validation. The 2nd jpg named log message 2 showing that the validation has failed, and the RTMT system log showing that the process ended at 20:55:50. During this period of time, the process named Mar 4 20:55:46, CUCM-PUB, Info, sshd(pam_unix)[18244], : session opened for user sftpuser by (uid=0), 18778 Mar 4 20:55:46, CUCM-PUB, Info, sshd(pam_unix)[18244], : session closed for user sftpuser, 18779...etc" and keep repeated The last two attachment are the System Log and Security Log copy out from RTMT. When refer to the security log at timing 20:55:46, the process show "Mar 4 20:55:46, CUCM-PUB, Info, sshd[18244], : Accepted password for sftpuser from :ffff:10.10.210.11 port 32829 ssh2, 13371 Mar 4 20:55:46, CUCM-PUB, Info, sshd[18246], : subsystem request for sftp, 13372" All help are welcome, guys. Many thanks Shingei On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:16 AM, Duy Nguyen <[email protected]> wrote: > Make it simplistic and add by ip. > > Pavan <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Do you have a dns server that is reachable from sub? > >Can you sniff the packets and post a capture? > > > >Sent from my phone > > > >On Mar 3, 2010, at 10:24 AM, ShinGei Yong <[email protected]> > >wrote: > > > >> Hi Bill, > >> > >> Thanks for spotting out the difference between the naming of the > >> nodes. Has been re-verify again the the node's naming and the > >> confirmed the hostname is correct throughout the setup. The naming > >> for Sub is under_scroll instead of hypen on the VM Console was just > >> because its a naming of the VM console. > >> > >> Applying a upgrade patch on CUCM under VM platform don't think is > >> possible. In fact, i didn't apply ANY patches to the CUCM-PUB, so am > >> sure the both the CUCM-PUB and CUCM-SUB version are same. > >> > >> Anymore possible solution coming? > >> > >> Thanks > >> Shingei > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Bill Talley <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> Are you sure hostnames are correct? On the previous screenshot > >> your CUCM-PUB servername has a hyphen between CUCM-PUB, however, you > >> vmware console window for your sub has CUCM_SUB. Is by chance your > >> PUB hostname CUCM_PUB, with an underscore instead of a hyphen? > >> > >> Any chance you had applied a patch to the PUB previously and it's no > >> longer version 7.0.1.11000-2? I've never tried installing a sub > >> with a different version so I'm not sure what the error would be > >> that is generated in that scenario. > >> > >> On Mar 2, 2010, at 12:59 AM, ShinGei Yong wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Roger, Berry, > >>> > >>> Am already did that a few times, adding, removing and re-adding the > >>> CUCM-Sub into the cluster inventory, but still got no chance to get > >>> it work. > >>> > >>> I think i've out of my mind, can't think of any possibilities. > >>> > >>> Anyone else can help? > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> Shingei > >>> > >>> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Berry, Matthew J. < > [email protected] > >>> > wrote: > >>> Good point, Roger. CUCM Pub needs something to validate against. > >>> > >>> - Sent from my Blackberry > >>> > >>> From: [email protected] < > [email protected] > >>> > > >>> To: ShinGei Yong <[email protected]>; > [email protected] > >>> <[email protected]> > >>> Sent: Mon Mar 01 04:27:15 2010 > >>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Failure of Adding subscriber-VM > >>> Server 2.0 > >>> > >>> Hi Shingei, > >>> > >>> This maybe a long shot, but anyway, have you added the sub as a UCM > >>> server on the pub before you tried to add it as a 2nd node? > >>> > >>> > >>> Roger Källberg > >>> Unified Communication Consultant > >>> Cygate AB > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> From: ShinGei Yong [mailto:[email protected]] > >>> Sent: den 1 mars 2010 03:29 > >>> To: [email protected] > >>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Failure of Adding subscriber-VM Server > >>> 2.0 > >>> > >>> > >>> Hi All, > >>> > >>> Im currently having the issue of adding the 2nd node to the UCM > >>> cluster. The error message as per attached jpg "Configuration > >>> Validation with CUCM-PUB Failed". > >>> > >>> I've did some research based on the error message, either from > >>> CISCO or some older post. What i've tried out was: > >>> > >>> 1. Adding a NTP server to CUCM-PUB. CUCM-PUB was able to get the > >>> time source from my WINXP modified NTP server, and can be viewed > >>> from CUCM CLI. > >>> 2. Changed of Security Password. Based on CISCO explanation, it > >>> could be due to the security password mismatch between CUCM-PUB and > >>> SUB. I've reset the security password and reboot the CUCM-PUB, but > >>> still got no luck. I did tried to input an "incorrect" Security > >>> Password while adding the 2nd node, it did correctly prompt that > >>> the password was error. So confirmed that the security password > >>> entered was correct. > >>> 3. Some post mentioned that the MTU for the CUCM, will have some > >>> issue if leave it to default, but i'm not too sure what does it > >>> mean? Should i change it to MTU size to 1492? > >>> > >>> I'm currently using VMWare Server 2.0. > >>> > >>> regards, > >>> Shingei > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > >>> please visit www.ipexpert.com > >> > >> ____________________________ > >> Bill Talley > >> IP Telephony Consultant > >> > >> Alexander Open Systems, Inc > >> 12851 Foster, Suite 200 > >> Overland Park, KS 66213 > >> (913) 307-2330, Scheduling Group > >> (913) 307-2380, Fax > >> [email protected] > >> http://www.aos5.com > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission (including > >> any accompanying attachments) is intended solely for its authorized > >> recipient(s), and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged > >> information. If you are not an intended recipient, or responsible > >> for delivering some or all of this transmission to an intended > >> recipient, be aware that any review, copying, printing, > >> distribution, use or disclosure of the contents of this message is > >> strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail > >> message in error, please delete it from your system without copying > >> it, and contact sender immediately by Reply e-mail, or by calling > 913-307-2300 > >> , so that our address records can be corrected. > >> > >> Although this e-mail and any attachments are believed to be free of > >> any virus or other defect that might negatively affect any computer > >> system into which it is received and opened, it is the > >> responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and > >> no responsibility is accepted by the sender for any loss or damage > >> arising in any way in the event that such a virus or defect exists. > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > >> please visit www.ipexpert.com > >_______________________________________________ > >For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
