Hi:
Your mixing traffic shapping with link fragmentation and interleaving
The first one (frame relay traffic shapping or cb traffic shapping) limits the
amount of bandwith that you send to a link for example to avoid service
provider policing to this traffic.
The second one is a link efficiency tool (both frf 12 or mlp) permit bigger
packects to be fragmented and be interleaved with other small (probably rtp)
packets, to avoid the impact of serilization delay, both of them works with
frame relay traffic shapping
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 09:35:56 -0500
From: ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] FRTS and MLP over a Serial with Sub-Interfaces
Quick question.
In the lab, if the HQ site is setup with two sub-interfaces that connect to BR1
and BR2 (i.e. meaning, they're both running off the same interface), how would
you configure MLP for one site and FRF.12 for another site?
According to my understanding, MLP will require that "frame-relay
traffic-shaping" is enabled on the serial interface. However, this would botch
up your FRF.12 configuration on the other sub-interface.
QoS is a weak area for me so I might be missing something obvious in this
question. However, it came up so I thought I would ask.
Thanks
--
Matthew Berry
A+, CCENT, CCNA, CCNA Voice, CCVP, CCIE Voice Written
Vitals:
GVoice: +1.612.424.5044
Gmail: ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com
Skype: ciscovoiceguru
Twitter: ciscovoiceguru
Cert Stats:
Cisco Cert Journey Began: Jan 1, 2009
1st Lab Attempt: Aug 16, 2010
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
