I would think/hope so. I suspect the branches for "successful" and "timeout", which are mutually exclusive, are implemented using an "if-then-else" type of construct.
[But then again, no better way to be sure than to lab it out!] thanks, /Baktha ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:31:33 +0200 > From: Juan Lopez <lopez.hernandez.j...@gmail.com> > To: Ken Wyan <kew...@gmail.com> > Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com, Gurpreet Singh Kukreja > <tycoononway1...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Scripts End Step > Message-ID: > <CANpj6cz0GC1pGoJCqPK_cH934nYeGD=qmzn_gynvkojqas7...@mail.gmail.com > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hi Ken, > Gurpreet/Peter are correct - you misunderstand as far as the script > behavour goes: the script goes to the next step if nothing is specified > under the 'menu' step's 'substep' (eg: no step defined under the > 'timeout', 'unsuccessful'...will take it to the next step defined after the > menu step) Therefore it is best to have a 'Goto' defined below the > 'connect' step so the script can 'terminate' using the 'terminate' step... > > hope this somewhat clear - not easy to explain ... ;) > > cheers, > Juan >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
