Release Notes for Cisco Unified Personal Communicator Release 7.0 <https://mail.google.com/mail/html/compose/static_files/blank_quirks.html#wp85054>has got all inbound & outbound port usage for CUPC
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cupc/7_0/english/release/notes/ol15710.html On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 5:27 PM, san r <luv...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think we will need to consider the citi port number too > On May 13, 2012 2:57 PM, "steven moran" <smoran...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I've been doing some work on this topic and have moved away from my >> original thoughts which were along the same lines as originally posted by >> Nazeer and a few others . Here are some recent thoughts on the subject >> >> the question is not particularly well worded, we can't really influence >> the traffic from the CUPC client to the server by applying policy on the >> server port. What we can do is control what the switch port does with >> packets from the CUPS server to the clients by classifying and applying an >> input ploicy on the server port. I went back to the presence section in >> the CUCM srnd - the only traffic between CUPC and CUPS seems be 5060 >> for sip/simple and 443 for SOAP, this was sort of backed up by the >> information in the CUPC 7.1 release. The release notes also mention that >> ports 16384-16424 are used for TFTP - but this would not be classed as >> signalling. Since there are other servers on the port any access list >> would need to specifiy the server IP address. If you wanted to make it >> really specific you could also specify the destination address of the CUPC >> clients as well. Finally by putting bidirectional access lists (any any eq >> and any eq any) you may loose the points as it might appear you are hedging >> your bets and do not know how directional QoS works. Also we are asked to >> guarantee 32k for signalling traffic if we put non signalling traffic into >> this policy we are not achieving the requirements. >> >> These statements are not facts, just my current opinion based on the last >> bits of documentation read and I am happy to discuss. >> Best regards. >> Steve >> >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >> >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
