Is it something like SIP/SIMPLE & SOAP towards Presence server and SIP/SIMPLE & CTI/QBE towards CUCM ?
2 ACL - one to CUPS and other to CUCM. Together can we call it as 'signalling' from presence communicator? http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/srnd/7x/presence.html -- Figure 22-1 Cisco Unified Presence Components http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Cisco_Unified_Presence,_Release_7.x_--_About_the_Interfaces_with_Cisco_Unified_Communications_Manager#About_the_Interfaces_with_Cisco_Unified_Communications_Manager Figure: Cisco Unified Presence Basic Deployment On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 4:19 AM, Brian Turner <brianstur...@gmail.com>wrote: > I think you guys are over thinking it maybe. Isn't all traffic from the > CUPC server Signaling traffic? The CUPC server doesn't really do anything > but "Signaling" > > Media traffic goes from enpoint to endpoint, or endpoint to MTP etc. All > other voice traffic is typically considered signaling. > > So an ACL that just matched all traffic to / from the CUPC server IP > address would include signaling traffic for the CUPC server and little else. > > I didn't see the earlier email concerning the wording of the question, so > this is a stab in the dark. > > Brian S Turner CCIE 6145 > > On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:39 AM, san r <luv...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Release Notes for Cisco Unified Personal Communicator Release 7.0 >> <https://mail.google.com/mail/html/compose/static_files/blank_quirks.html#wp85054>has >> got all inbound & outbound port usage for CUPC >> >> >> >> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cupc/7_0/english/release/notes/ol15710.html >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 5:27 PM, san r <luv...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I think we will need to consider the citi port number too >>> On May 13, 2012 2:57 PM, "steven moran" <smoran...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I've been doing some work on this topic and have moved away from my >>>> original thoughts which were along the same lines as originally posted by >>>> Nazeer and a few others . Here are some recent thoughts on the subject >>>> >>>> the question is not particularly well worded, we can't really influence >>>> the traffic from the CUPC client to the server by applying policy on the >>>> server port. What we can do is control what the switch port does with >>>> packets from the CUPS server to the clients by classifying and applying an >>>> input ploicy on the server port. I went back to the presence section in >>>> the CUCM srnd - the only traffic between CUPC and CUPS seems be 5060 >>>> for sip/simple and 443 for SOAP, this was sort of backed up by the >>>> information in the CUPC 7.1 release. The release notes also mention that >>>> ports 16384-16424 are used for TFTP - but this would not be classed as >>>> signalling. Since there are other servers on the port any access list >>>> would need to specifiy the server IP address. If you wanted to make it >>>> really specific you could also specify the destination address of the CUPC >>>> clients as well. Finally by putting bidirectional access lists (any any eq >>>> and any eq any) you may loose the points as it might appear you are hedging >>>> your bets and do not know how directional QoS works. Also we are asked to >>>> guarantee 32k for signalling traffic if we put non signalling traffic into >>>> this policy we are not achieving the requirements. >>>> >>>> These statements are not facts, just my current opinion based on the >>>> last bits of documentation read and I am happy to discuss. >>>> Best regards. >>>> Steve >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>>> >>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >>>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> > >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
