Bill,

Your feedback has been awesome - much appreciated by all here, I'm certain - it has definitely refined and clarified my own vague thinking in this area considerably - thankyou!

Could you expand on the phone provisioning method you use?

I'm taking far too long on this during practice (and obviously when I've been supporting the profitability of the Cisco catering team in Brussels previously...) and it is an area I've been looking to completely transform for my next attempt.

Is there a documentation link or example you could point me at on this?

I'd like to see what difference it would make to my times by trying this (radically) different approach!

regards

Peter

Peter Simmons

On 4/3/2013 5:59 PM, William Bell wrote:
I am not familiar with Marko's approach for "on-screen" window placement.

I actually don't have a specific strategy in this area.

I do create a notepad file for the following:


basic.txt:  basic infrastructure notes and notes on phone/user configs
sw.txt: switch configs
hq.txt: HQ gateway/router configs
sb.txt: Site B gateway/router configs
sc.txt: Site C gateway/router configs
rp.txt: Route plan configs (when I get to that point)

I have the above .txt files open all of the time. I only keep basic.txt "up" on the screen. I keep the others minimized. I restore them "as needed".

During the course of the exam I will create other notepad files temporarily. Most notably:

1. When I create partitions. I have a naming convention that is basically uniform across sites. So, I lay out the HQ versions in notepad. Paste in CUCM. Then do a search/replace for "HQ"/"SB". Repeat for Site C. Kill the notepad

2. When I provision phones. I use a series of SQL commands from the CLI to provision phones. I type them out in notepad and paste from there. Then I kill the notepad.

3. Troubleshooting questions. Because I don't want to deal with VNC's sluggish nature, I'll do my TS work in notepad on the candidate PC and then copy/paste to the VNC desktop.

I think that's it.

As far as window orientation. I keep basic.txt in the top right corner of the screen. If I need hq.txt/sb.txt/etc. then I restore to bottom right. I'll keep (or try to keep) console sessions in the middle and IE sessions near the left. But I haven't really thought about it that much.


-Bill

--
William Bell
blog: http://ucguerrilla.com
twitter: @ucguerrilla



On Apr 3, 2013, at 12:32 PM, Ramcharan Arya wrote:

Hi Bill,

Thank you very much for nice writeup on strategy.

This is really helpful for CCIE vocie lab aspirants. Do you have any strategy how many notepad sessions to keep open simultaneously.

How to arrange SecureCRT sessions screen, online lab webpage, and notepad on 32" screen.

I am still practice same method which I learn during R&S bootcamp with Marko.If you have any better approach please share.


Regards,
Ramcharan Arya
CCIE # 28926 (R&S)



On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 10:57 AM, William Bell <b...@ucguerrilla.com <mailto:b...@ucguerrilla.com>> wrote:

    I have had this as a draft for a few days. Just too busy to
    finish it until now. So, some of my thoughts are redundant to
    what others have said. Hopefully that isn't a bad thing.

    Timing is definitely a critical aspect of the exam. I know I have
    areas where I am slower than I should be. I suspect most people
    do. Most of my comments herein are based on my self-study
    practice labs. I have taken the lab a couple of times but most of
    the tinkering I have done with my method is during self-study.
    When I sit for the real lab, I don't tinker. I go with whatever
    method I have been practicing. So, that is suggestion #1: Don't
    tinker on lab day, stick to your guns and don't 2nd guess your
    method.

    Going back to the OP, I believe you should look at the bright
    side. Your statement "...I seemed to keep moving forward..." is
    key. The fact you were able to avoid a stall is important. I
    believe controlling this exam is about rhythm and finding what
    config approach helps you establish a sustainable and consistent
    rhythm. Speed on any individual task is critical but rhythm is
    king in my opinion.

    Like others (most?), I follow the device-based approach. It has
    been around since pre 3.0 blueprint (contrary to popular opinion)
    and is a proven strategy. However, I have found that you will
    need to customize that approach to suit your needs. For me, it is
    about managing the transitions. Again, I believe focusing on
    establishing and maintaining a rhythm is absolutely key.
    Smoothing the transitions and/or stacking tasks that help ease
    transitions is important. Also, you won't maintain the same
    rhythm throughout the exam. Some tasks you will bang out (or
    should) very fast. Others, you will need to pay close attention
    to what you are doing.

    So, suggestion #2 is find your rhythm.

    Establishing your rhythm is a product of repetition. Practice,
    practice, practice as Mr. Sears puts it. You may also need some
    face time with the real lab to help you come into your rhythm.
    For example, some of the "weak spots" I had (or maybe still have)
    and adjustments I made.


    1. Transitioning from read-through to config. The read through
    is/was the worst for me. Most people I have spoken with (who have
    passed or come close) are able to get through the read-through in
    30 minutes. Some say less. I was taking a whole lot more time
    than 30 minutes. My budget for this task is 30m today.

    Adjustments I made:

      * Dial Plan. I was building out my dial plan (on paper) during
        the read through. My logic was that "you have to do it at
        some point, just do it now". The flaw with that logic is that
        to establish a good rhythm, you need to avoid lingering on a
        task for too long. I decided that I would focus on getting
        the tasks mapped out as quick as possible and the task of
        mapping out a dial plan could wait. So, I added a section in
        my table to track the DP-related tasks by task ID (e.g. 4.1)
        only.
      * Skim. I already know that I am going to do a thorough read on
        the questions at least once (during config) and likely twice
        (during validation). No sense in reading the question in
        detail 3 times. So, I mainly focus on what devices/apps are
        affected by the question and put the ID in the table.


    How I use this task:

      * I build a table (like the dev-based approach table) to track
        tasks
      * I build a table to track what the PSTN wants to see for off
        net calls (this is key because I can build an entire h323
        config just on that info)
      * I track phone/user features/buttons/etc. This goes to speed
        when customizing phones
      * I build a basic.txt text file to capture IP addresses, vlans,
        interface assignments, etc. I keep this very short. Note that
        with the new exam, the instructions are electronic. This
        kinda de-emphasizes the need to store some of this info.



    2. Where to stick in QoS. QoS is clearly infrastructure and all
    of the action happens in the router config. However, for me there
    is a "slow down" if I try to stick QoS config in with banging out
    vlan, ntp, dhcp, rsvp, mrm, h323, etc. I can do all of the other
    IOS configs very quickly in notepad. QoS is noticeably "slower"
    for me.

    Adjustment I made:

      * I avoid auto qos on the LAN switch if I can. I have found the
        LAN QoS questions to be "incomplete". Meaning, they don't
        reflect reality in any way. So, if I can I just bang out the
        minimum config w/o auto-qos and I do it as part of my regular
        infrastructure.
      * I push WAN QoS until after I get phones to auto-register. I
        do all of the switch, HQ, SB, and SC infrastructure and I
        come back to WAN QoS after device registration. Lately, I
        have been practicing with WAN QoS happening after CUCM base
        config (MGCP, MRG, phones, etc.). So, somewhere around the 3
        hour mark.  Others like to tackle it earlier on and that
        works to. There is no absolute here. Just pick a hole that
        works with your rhythm.


    3. Site C and CUE. CUE is a real pain and can really mess with
    your rhythm. The key is to attack it early and check on it often.
    I treat CUE as background noise. It doesn't get dedicated face
    time with me until I have the users configured and need to
    customize the experience per requirement. I also have a goal to
    get CUE (and CUC) done before lunch.

    Approach:

      * I configure IS Engine interface (loopback, routing, etc.) on
        SC as one of the first things I do on that device. I then
        reset the module to ensure my IP addressing is applied.
      * I then work on SC configs in notepad and watch CUE in the
        background
      * When CUE is up, I'll do the software license install (if
        needed/applicable) and then restore factory defaults
      * I'll usually have SC configs done (except maybe SRST) before
        CUE comes up the first time. While CUE is reloading a second
        time I am:
          o working on SC-SRST configs in notepad
          o starting my CUCM work
          o watching CUE labor through it's start up process (I say
            labor because, it does seem like a lot of effort to boot
            up a device that doesn't do all that much. It's like
            watching a 90 year old man climb steps. I digress.)


    Bottom Line: CUE is one of those items that can mess up your
    rhythm. Find a way to handle it that works for you.

    4. Transitioning from the router configs to the CUCM. You can get
    a head a steam behind you on the IOS-configs and then BLAM, you
    are in clickety-click land with a GUI. This transition always
    threw off my rhythm.

    I found that figuring out how I needed to deal with CUE helped me
    with addressing the transition to GUI-land. At the time I am
    working on Site C, I am working on a couple of things in parallel
    and am constantly busy. Which helps me carry the rhythm from the
    CLI-based configs forward.


    5. Where to put the dial plan. I was in the mind set of trying to
    get the dial plan done sooner rather than later. However, since I
    decided to remove the task of mapping out the dial plan during
    the read through. I found that picking a place to stick it was
    pretty key. I decided to wait until after lunch to config the
    dial plan since lunch forces a "natural" transition period upon
    you. Also, I found that your mind could use a moment to collect
    itself before dorking with the dial plan. Coming back from lunch
    I start the afternoon the same way I did the morning. I plan.

    6. SRST. There are so many freakin' bugs involving SRST in this
    lab that I found you want to do it sooner rather than later. I
    actually build the SRST configs during infrastructure phase. I
    don't apply the configs until I have phones registered and
    configured. I test SRST once and only once. I do it after I have
    completed all of the lab config requirements. It is the first
    thing I "validate".

    6. Transitioning from "doing" to "checking". The area I am still
    working on. Over the months of prep I am putting into this thing,
    I have come to the realization that a validation strategy is just
    as important as a config strategy. I am not talking about know
    what commands to use to validate a task. I am talking about how
    you stack the validation approach. I have found that while it is
    more efficient to do a dev-based approach for configuration, it
    is not a good approach for validation. So, I do a tech-based
    validation. I also do some minimum validation in-line with the
    configuration. But definitely keep that at a minimum or you bleed
    minutes.

    -Bill


    --
    William Bell
    blog: http://ucguerrilla.com <http://ucguerrilla.com/>
    twitter: @ucguerrilla



    On Mar 26, 2013, at 7:40 PM, Dane Warner wrote:

    To All,
    I took my second attempt on Monday, March 25 and did not pass.
    I was hoping for some insight on concrete suggestions to get faster.
    I didn't get hung up on any one task, I seemed to keep moving
    forward and tried to type as fast as I could, using CLI
    shortcuts, etc.
    I used the device-based methodology and I feel pretty confident
    of my technical knowledge.
    Yet I didn't even get to many tasks at all, I would have needed
    another 2-3 hours to complete all tasks.
    I hear of candidates completing all tasks in 6-7 hours, which
    means I would need to become twice as fast as my last attempt.
    It almost sounds insurmountable. Do I need to take typing classes?
    Any recommendations that don't break the NDA would be greatly
    appreciated.
    Regards,
    *Dane Warner, CCVP*
    *Sr. Network Engineer*
    *Epoch Universal, Inc.*
    *(909)226-0755 <tel:%28909%29226-0755>*
    *dwar...@epochuniversal.com <mailto:dwar...@epochuniversal.com> *
    *<image001.png>*
    _______________________________________________
    For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab
    training, please visitwww.ipexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com/>

    Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check
    outwww.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com/>


    _______________________________________________
    For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab
    training, please visit www.ipexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com/>

    Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
    www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com/>





_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Reply via email to