On 16 Jan, Tim Fenn wrote: > then you should recheck your list. Many of the software packages on > your link use licenses that are neither OSI nor FSF approved - see
If you had specifics, that would be helpful. As a GNU-Darwin.org admin, I am obviously aware of the free software definition, but define FOSS to be more inclusive for the broader arenas of professional pursuits and political activism. In the essay, this position is employed for the purpose of coalition building, so that we can find common ground. There is much at stake. Here is the link again for your convenience. http://proclus.gnu-darwin.org/aCommunique2.html Thanks Tim for your excellent contributions to FOSS in science. Regards, Michael L. Love -- Visit proclus realm! http://proclus.tripod.com/ -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GMU/S d+@ s: a+ C++++ UBULI++++$ P+ L+++(++++) E--- W++ N- !o K- w--- !O M++@ V-- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP-- t+++(+) 5+++ X+ R tv-(--)@ b !DI D- G e++++ h--- r+++ y++++ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
pgpYfsZYRs2Cz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
