Recently, a make-or-break difference for me was making sure the pH was what I 
thought it was:

In the presence of 50mM HEPES pH 7.0 (at room temp), the pH of my protein 
sample was actually
nearer to 6 at 4degC, as judged by pH paper. I am not sure whether the pH 
difference was mainly
because of the  temperature drop or because of other components in the mixture, 
but adding an
additional 50mM TRIS pH 8.5 (RT) made all the difference. The pH paper after 
this addition
indicated a pH of 7-8. In the former case, the protein was completely 
undetectable in elution
fractions, and in the latter, was successfully purified. Of course this makes 
complete biochemical
sense, but nevertheless I am very glad I checked the pH.

Jacob Keller


On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 8:12:46 pm CDT changrui lu wrote:

Dear all,

I am trying to express a 150 kd protein in E coli. I have it in two
constructs, one with pmal-his and other with only his tag at N terminus. The
full length protein can be detected both by sds and western using anti-his
(190kd and 150kd respectively) but strangely neither binds to his-column
very well. The majority of the full length comes through the column either
at loading step or low salt wash step. The major species that gets trapped
and eluted is the mbp-his truncation (~40kd). Some, though very little, full
length protein did make it out the his column. The pmal-his construct does
not bind amylose resin any better with majority flows right through. All
purification are carried out under standard conditions as mentioned in the
manuals. The protein is soluble and does not precipitate in the columns. I
appreciate and ideas or explanations.

Thanks in advance.

Ray
Cornell Univerisity
===========End of original message text===========



***********************************
Jacob Keller
Northwestern University
6541 N. Francisco #3
Chicago IL 60645
(847)491-2438
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
***********************************

Reply via email to