Dear everyone,
              
                        I am using sfall in "MODE ATMMAP RESMOD" to compute a 
tagged map with
which to score a model against a map. The input PDB is OK and regularly
read by all programs - but sfall seems to interpret the coordinates
wrongly (see the list of the first 10 atoms coordinates that the program
outputs, both in orthogonal and fractional):

First 10 atoms of atsort - orthog coordinates
         1N    CYS       140283.0180251.2380115.7960 1.00  500.00    3
   fractional coordinates  1.57127 1.39484 0.64288


  First 10 atoms of atsort - orthog coordinates
         2CA   CYS       140281.9190250.4390115.2740 1.00  500.00    2
   fractional coordinates  1.56517 1.39040 0.63998
         3C    CYS       140280.7020251.2870114.8740 1.00  500.00    2
   fractional coordinates  1.55842 1.39511 0.63776
         4O    CYS       140279.7890250.8050114.1860 1.00  500.00    4
   fractional coordinates  1.55335 1.39243 0.63394
         5CB   CYS       140281.5250249.4400116.3580 1.00  500.00    2
   fractional coordinates  1.56299 1.38485 0.64600
         6SG   CYS       140280.3360248.2280115.8470 1.00  500.00    5
   fractional coordinates  1.55638 1.37813 0.64317
         7N    SER       141280.6900252.5440115.3270 1.00  500.00    3
   fractional coordinates  1.55835 1.40209 0.64028
         8CA   SER       141279.5620253.4720115.1380 1.00  500.00    2
   fractional coordinates  1.55209 1.40724 0.63923
         9CB   SER       141279.7800254.7110116.0260 1.00  500.00    2
   fractional coordinates  1.55330 1.41412 0.64416
        10OG   SER       141280.9710255.4130115.6440 1.00  500.00    4
   fractional coordinates  1.55991 1.41802 0.64204
        11C    SER       141279.3470253.9090113.6680 1.00  500.00    2
   fractional coordinates  1.55089 1.40967 0.63107
  First 10 atoms of sorted file in asym unit -
       10.55639   0.64317   0.37813    699.89 1.00         5  102SG
CYS
       10.56299   0.64600   0.38485    599.89 1.00         2  102CB
CYS
       10.56517   0.63998   0.39040    299.89 1.00         2  102CA
CYS
       10.55335   0.63394   0.39243    499.89 1.00         4  102O
CYS
       10.57127   0.64288   0.39484    199.89 1.00         3  102N
CYS
       10.55842   0.63776   0.39511    399.89 1.00         2  102C
CYS
       10.55835   0.64028   0.40209    799.89 1.00         3  103N
SER
       10.55209   0.63923   0.40724    899.89 1.00         2  103CA
SER
       10.55330   0.64416   0.41412    999.89 1.00         2  103CB
SER
       10.55991   0.64204   0.41802   1099.89 1.00         4  103OG
SER

As a result of course the tagged map is completely screwed.

Has anyone encountered this problem and if so how did they solve it? I
would rather avoid digging into the code if I can!

        Best regards

        Pietro
-- 
Pietro Roversi
Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, Oxford University
South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3ER, England UK
Tel. 0044-1865-275385

Reply via email to