I agree with many others: this is quite possibly sulfate or phosphate.
If collected at 1.54A the anomalous map should help identify the
presence of sulfur. Sulfate or phosphate may be present at lower than
full occupancy. I would refine everything else you reasonably know in
the model (including water and any other anions, ligands, etc.) and see
if the blob of density sharpens up. Usually a sulfate looks like a
sphere of density, and a sulfate + water may be somewhat elongated. If
the difference map without modeled anion looks reasonable, try a
sulfate of phosphate at 1.0 or 0.5 occupancy to see if the 2Fo-Fc and
Fo-Fc maps still look reasonable. There is plenty of precedent for
sulfate/phosphate binding near Glu and Arg residues. If you have
negative Fo-Fc density when using sulfate at 0.5 occupancy, you may
have no other reasonable choice than to model with water (or nothing at
all), with the acknowledgment that this may not be completely correct,
either. Cheers. On 2/3/2010 12:17 PM, Katja Schleider wrote:
--
Roger S. Rowlett Professor Department of Chemistry Colgate University 13 Oak Drive Hamilton, NY 13346 tel: (315)-228-7245 ofc: (315)-228-7395 fax: (315)-228-7935 email: rrowl...@colgate.edu |
- Re: [ccp4bb] Unknown density Roger Rowlett
- Re: [ccp4bb] Unknown density Mark J. van Raaij
- Re: [ccp4bb] unknown density Mark J. van Raaij
- Re: [ccp4bb] unknown density David J. Schuller
- Re: [ccp4bb] unknown density Dale Tronrud
- Re: [ccp4bb] unknown density Vellieux Frederic
- Re: [ccp4bb] unknown density Bernhard Rupp
- Re: [ccp4bb] unknown density Bostjan Kobe
- Re: [ccp4bb] unknown density Mayer, Mark (NIH/NICHD) [E]
- Re: [ccp4bb] unknown density Roger Rowlett