Dear All,
I would like to bring to your attention the recent Editorial in Acta
Cryst D (http://journals.iucr.org/d/issues/2010/12/00/issconts.html),
which highlights the long-standing issue of under-citation of papers
published in the IUCr journals. The Editorial, having looked at the
papers published in 2009 in Nature, Science, Cell and PNAS, concluded:
'almost half of all references to publications in IUCr journals end up
being published in the supplementary material only... Not only does this
mean that the impact factor of IUCr journals should be higher, but also
that the real overall numbers of citations of methods papers are much
higher than what is reported, for instance, by the Web of Science'
Although this topic may seem to concern mostly methods developers, I
think the whole research community will only benefit from more fair
credit that we all give to our colleagues via referencing their
publications. What do you think?
Victor
- [ccp4bb] Citations in supplementary material Victor Lamzin
-