-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 06/13/2013 06:16 PM, Ed Pozharski wrote: > [...] With that said, I am pretty sure that in vast majority of > cases structural conclusions derived with I/s=2 vs CC1/2=0.5 vs > DR=0 cutoff will be essentially the same. Hi Ed, in my experience, CC(1/2) > 0.7 corresponds quite well to I/sigI > 2.0 rather than CC(1/2) > 0.5 (again, with the default resolution shells from xprep that also plots CC(1/2) vs. resolution. Are above numbers based on experience, too? If so, which program do you usually use to look at these statistics? Tim - -- - -- Dr Tim Gruene Institut fuer anorganische Chemie Tammannstr. 4 D-37077 Goettingen GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFRufFfUxlJ7aRr7hoRAk5UAKCHC1IpbdXmQE/5e1eRD+SON+jarQCg0b3m JCduhOJnVhczCUy+qv9n3Oc= =BY32 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
