I guess somebody could add it here perhaps ?
http://ccp4wiki.org/~ccp4wiki/wiki/index.php?title=Special:Allpages

or start their own wiki on "Tips & tricks in crystallography" and why you 
should always have olive oil when traveling to a synchrotron (well nowadays 
it’s becoming more difficult to actually be physically present at such a 
facility, then the olive oil won’t help either for cryo protection)

Jürgen

......................
Jürgen Bosch
Johns Hopkins University
Bloomberg School of Public Health
Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
Johns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute
615 North Wolfe Street, W8708
Baltimore, MD 21205
Office: +1-410-614-4742<tel:%2B1-410-614-4742>
Lab:      +1-410-614-4894<tel:%2B1-410-614-4894>
Fax:      +1-410-955-2926<tel:%2B1-410-955-2926>
http://lupo.jhsph.edu

On Feb 13, 2014, at 10:21 AM, Nat Echols 
<nathaniel.ech...@gmail.com<mailto:nathaniel.ech...@gmail.com>> wrote:

One comment (not a complaint) on all this: it seems like the same questions get 
asked over and over again.  If there is a good place for a general 
crystallography FAQ list it is well past time for one to be put together - or 
maybe it just needs to be better advertised?  At a minimum, for instance:

- what cryoprotectant should I use?
- how do I get big single crystals?
- how do I improve diffraction?
- how can I tell if I've solved my structure?
- why is my R-free stuck?
- is <pick random statistic> suitable for publication?

Some of the other common queries ("name my blob!") still need to be handled on 
a case-by-case basis, but it would be much more efficient for everyone if the 
standard answers were collected somewhere permanent.

-Nat



On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Eugene Valkov 
<eugene.val...@gmail.com<mailto:eugene.val...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I absolutely agree with Juergen.

Leaving aside methods developers, who are a completely different breed, there 
is no such thing as a "crystallographer" sitting in a dark room solving 
structures all day. If there are, these are anachronisms destined for 
evolutionary demise.

More and more cell biologists, immunologists and all other kinds of biologists 
are having a go at doing structural work with their molecules of interest 
themselves without involving the "professionals". Typically, they learn on the 
job and they need advice with all kinds of things ranging from cloning and 
protein preps through to issues with tetartohedrally-twinned data and 
interpreting their structures.

So, a modern structural biologist is one who is equipped for the wet lab and 
has some idea of how to go about solving structures. CCP4BB is a wonderful 
resource that is great for both the quality of the advice offered to those that 
seek it and for the variety of topics that are addressed in the scope of 
structural biology. I have learnt greatly from reading posts from very skilled 
and knowledgeable scientists at this forum and then implemented these insights 
into my own research. I am very grateful for this.

In short, please do not discourage your colleagues, particularly very junior 
ones, from posting to the CCP4BB. Some of the questions may appear quaint or 
irrelevant but it is easy to simply ignore topics that are of no interest!

Eugene


On 13 February 2014 14:41, Bosch, Juergen 
<jubo...@jhsph.edu<mailto:jubo...@jhsph.edu>> wrote:
Let me pick up Eleanor’s comment:
is there something like a crystallographer today ? I mean in the true sense ?
I think as a “crystallographer” you won’t be able to survive the next decade, 
you need to diversify your toolset of techniques as pointed out in this article
http://www.nature.com/naturejobs/science/articles/10.1038/nj7485-711a

And I’m not quite sure how software developers see themselves, as I would argue 
they are typically maybe not doing so much wet lab stuff related to 
crystallography (I may be wrong here) but rather code these days.

What “type” of crystallographer is a software developer ?

I think like our beloved crystals “we” come in different flavors. And we need 
to train the next generation of students with that perspective in mind.

Just my two cents on a snowy day (>30cm over night)

Jürgen
......................
Jürgen Bosch
Johns Hopkins University
Bloomberg School of Public Health
Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
Johns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute
615 North Wolfe Street, W8708
Baltimore, MD 21205
Office: +1-410-614-4742<tel:%2B1-410-614-4742>
Lab:      +1-410-614-4894<tel:%2B1-410-614-4894>
Fax:      +1-410-955-2926<tel:%2B1-410-955-2926>
http://lupo.jhsph.edu<http://lupo.jhsph.edu/>

On Feb 13, 2014, at 6:41 AM, Eleanor Dodson 
<eleanor.dod...@york.ac.uk<mailto:eleanor.dod...@york.ac.uk>> wrote:

I agree with Frank - it keeps crystallographers modest to know how
challenging wet lab stuff still is..
Eleanor

On 12 February 2014 19:23, Robbie Joosten 
<robbie_joos...@hotmail.com<mailto:robbie_joos...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
It's not an e-mail bulletin board, but Researchgate seems to be quite
popular for wet lab questions. IMO the Q&A section of the social network is
a bit messy. That said, the quality seems to improve gradually.

Cheers,
Robbie

Sent from my Windows Phone
________________________________
Van: Paul Emsley
Verzonden: 12-2-2014 19:23
Aan: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK<mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
Onderwerp: Re: [ccp4bb] Sister CCPs


On 12/02/14 15:59, George Sheldrick wrote:
It would be so nice to have a 'sister CCP' for questions aboud wet-lab
problems that have nothing to do with CCP4 or crystallographic
computing, The is clearly a big need for it, and those of us who try
to keep out of wet-labs would not have to wade though it all.


FWIW, the remit of CCP4BB, held at jiscmail-central, is describes as:

/The CCP4BB mailing list is for discussions on the use of the CCP4
suite, and macromolecular crystallography in general./



Thus wet-lab questions are not off-topic (not that anyone recently
described them as such).

Having said that, Jiscmail mailing lists are easy to set-up (providing
that you can reasonably expect that the mailing list will improve
knowledge sharing within the UK centered academic community) and
relatively low maintenance. I, for one, would not be entirely unhappy to
miss out on questions about lysis.

Paul.




--
Dr Eugene Valkov

Room 3N049
Division of Structural Studies

MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology
Francis Crick Avenue
Cambridge Biomedical Campus
Cambridge CB2 0QH, U.K.

Email: eval...@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk<mailto:eval...@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk>
Tel: +44 (0) 1223 267358<tel:%2B44%20%280%29%201223%20267358>


Reply via email to