Yes - I agree about the irritation, but the LINKR record is actally more informative than the LINK
LINKR can point to a named LINK which involves angles as well as a distance.. I think LINKR defines a needed coordinate feature but how to get the wwwPDB to accept it??? E On 9 December 2017 at 20:34, Bernhard Rupp <hofkristall...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Developers, > > > > the TER issue in REFMAC seems to be fixed, but is really necessary that > REFMAC places LINKR > > records instead of LINK records in the PDB header? > > > > The PDB does not recognize those, and although it’s only a minor nuisance > to fix them in an editor, > > one tends to forget this between revisions…or the PDB could simply ignore > the ‘R’…. > > > > Best, BR > > > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Bernhard Rupp > > http://www.hofkristallamt.org/ > > b...@hofkristallamt.org > > +1 925 209 7429 <(925)%20209-7429> > > +43 767 571 0536 <+43%207675%20710536> > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Many plausible ideas vanish > > at the presence of thought > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > >
