Thank you Tim and Kay.
"the indexing procedure is independent of the starting angle of the first frame." --> I see, since XDS does indexing, I think that XDS is independent of the starting angle of the first frame "Are you possibly looking for the OSCILLATION_WIDTH=, i.e. the degree per frame during data collection?" --> As I see http://xds.mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de/html_doc/xds_parameters.html#OSCILLATION_RANGE= OSCILLATION_RANGE= ! (not OSCILLATION_WIDTH!) appears to designate 1 value, rather than 2 values (like min and max, e.g. -60, 60). Since I don't know correct value of OSCILLATION_RANGE, I just changed to the example value (0.1) from (0.899999976, I know it is not a positive multiple of 0.0001, but worked for ketone data). Then, xds ran without error. Then, according to recommendtion, I changed from JOB=XYCORR INIT COLSPOT IDXREF DEFPIX INTEGRATE CORRECT to JOB= DEFPIX INTEGRATE CORRECT and ran again. This time, it generated CORRECT.LP, but I see COMPLETENESS is only ~6%, while my predecessor achieved ~60% I think that results of XDS are somehow random (not 100% deterministic). But I didn't expect this big difference of COMPLETENESS (6% vs 60%). I think that I still entered a wrong option value somewhere in my XDS.INP. I think that I need to use well documented (with respect to needed xds.INP parameters) microED dataset but I can't download from https://cryoem.ucla.edu/MicroED ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1 This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/
