I cant see how the C2 cell can be reindexed to the P/mmm one?
Am I right to assume these are different processing of the same
diffraction?
And how many molecules do you have in each cell?
Eleanor



On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 12:52, Schreuder, Herman /DE <
herman.schreu...@sanofi.com> wrote:

> Dear Sayan,
>
>
>
> Thank you for this information. Why are your spots overlapping? The axes
> of your crystal are not particularly long. Did you put the detector very
> close to the crystal, or are there multiple diffraction patterns?
>
>
>
> Did you run Zanuda on your P1 structure? What Rfactors do you get when you
> complete the refinement in P1?
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Herman
>
>
>
> *Von:* Sayan Saha <ssaha43...@gmail.com>
> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 28. Juli 2022 11:43
> *An:* Schreuder, Herman /DE <herman.schreu...@sanofi.com>
> *Cc:* CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> *Betreff:* Re: [ccp4bb] Regarding the correct space group identification
>
>
>
> Dear Sir,
>
>
>
> 1. There are no ice-rings. However, diffraction spots seem to be
> overlapping. This can be seen during the data processing, as the space
> group (C2 or P222) varies even in the consecutive frames.
>
>
>
> 2. Crystal packing of C2 and P22121 seem to be similar (please see the
> attached images).
>
>
>
> 3. Forgot to mention in my previous email that we have already processed
> the data in P1 and MR solution could be found only in P1 (Phaser was used
> with an option in all possible space groups of that point group).
>
>
>
> Please let me know if any other information is required.
>
>
>
> With best regards,
>
> Sayan Saha.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 1:26 PM Schreuder, Herman /DE <
> herman.schreu...@sanofi.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Sayan,
>
>
>
> If a subunit is correctly oriented, but the translation is incorrect,
> density for a ligand may still show up in the binding site of the protein.
> It might be that one of the 2-fold axes, you think is crystallographic, is
> in fact non crystallographic and a few Angstroms away from the
> crystallographic position.
>
>
>
> What I would do:
>
>    1. Check the images: are there ice-rings or other artifacts that could
>    cause scaling problems that would lead to high Rw/Rf values? In that case,
>    there is not much you can do.
>    2. Compare the C2 and P22121 solutions: do they have the same overall
>    crystal packing (CS+NCS), or are they different? Do they have the same
>    Rw/Rf values? Can we learn anything from the differences in overall crystal
>    packing?
>    3. Process, run MR and refine in P1. Do you get lower R-factors? If
>    so, then run Zanuda to find out the real space group.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Herman
>
>
>
> *Von:* CCP4 bulletin board <CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK> *Im Auftrag von *Sayan
> Saha
> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 28. Juli 2022 08:15
> *An:* CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> *Betreff:* [ccp4bb] Regarding the correct space group identification
>
>
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> We have collected home-source X-ray intensity data for a protein at 2.6
> Angstrom. The data can be processed in either C2 (a=120, b=80, c=85 and
> beta=115) or P222 (P22121, a=80, b=85, c=110). MR solution can be obtained
> in both the space groups. However, the solution can be refined with an
> Rw/Rf of 29/32% only. The protein is bound to a ligand (co-crystallization)
> for which a clear density can be observed.
>
>
>
> Any help and suggestion in this regard would be very helpful.
>
>
>
> With best regards,
>
> Sayan Saha.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
>

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/

Reply via email to