On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 07:28:00PM -0500, Dan Weber wrote: > > How much slower would it be using std::list. We know std::list is very > well tested and usable. I'm thinking about sending a patch just because > I'm not interested in instability in my applications. > > Dan
I've had funny experiencies with the STL of Visual C++, though they may have improved in the last two years. Apart from atrocious implementations, the performace loss should not be too big not even noticeable, but it depends on what list we consider (list of packets, ssrcs, participants, destinations, etc. may show significant differences in size and use frequency depending on the application). I think the best solution would be to replace handcrafted lists with templates similar to the objlink template of commonc++, without the overhead derived from additional functionality or deficient STLs. _______________________________________________ Ccrtp-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ccrtp-devel
