> On Dec 11, 2015, at 4:43 PM, Fred Cisin <ci...@xenosoft.com> wrote: > >>> It's a total waste of time having to re-read all the unnecessary crap >>> many times just to get to a one sentence reply. > > IFF people were to be considerate and delete/trim/remove all of the > irrelevant parts of the quoted material, then the placement of the reply > would not matter. We are arguing over which is the best way to work around > refusal to trim by lazy inconsiderate people. > >> That is _exactly_ why quotes should be trimmed for relevance.
I agree. I prefer top posting in those cases because then I don’t have to scroll through *pages* of text that I’ve already read just to find one or two lines of text. I’m at the point now that if I can’t see the reply on the first page of an email (which given my screen size and font combination is about 60 lines), I ignore it (and silently curse bottom posting). ;-) TTFN - Guy
