> On Dec 11, 2015, at 7:12 PM, Brent Hilpert <hilp...@cs.ubc.ca> wrote: > > On 2015-Dec-11, at 4:43 PM, Fred Cisin wrote: > >>>> It's a total waste of time having to re-read all the unnecessary crap >>>> many times just to get to a one sentence reply. >> >> IFF people were to be considerate and delete/trim/remove all of the >> irrelevant parts of the quoted material, then the placement of the reply >> would not matter. We are arguing over which is the best way to work around >> refusal to trim by lazy inconsiderate people. > > On this list many replies involve responses to multiple points in the prior > material. Even if people trim the prior material, top-posting will still be > non-sensical and confusing. > For discussions of the nature for which this list is intended, bottom-posting > - after appropriately trimmed/selected prior point(s) - is the clearest and > most (or only) consistent method. > > Top posting may be workable for simple, private, casual conversations. That's > not this list. >
Now that I have been here a few days now I agree 100% I hope my sig is gone now I removed it lol sorry about that.
