> On Mar 12, 2023, at 3:01 AM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org> > wrote: > > On 3/11/23 14:34, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote: >> On 3/11/23 13:28, Paul Koning wrote: >> >>> >>> Dijkstra said as much when he evaluated the 1620 for possible use by the TU >>> Eindhoven -- a big problem is that it was unable to handle arbitrary 8-bit >>> data. >> > > Perhaps I need to elaborate on my earlier response for those not > familiar with the 1620. > ... > There is no stack,but there is a single register that holds a single > return address when a Branch-and-transmit instruction is executed. > There is a single instruction that branches to the location held in that > register; the register itself is not addressable. > ... > Hope this provides some background for what irked Dijkgstra. Dijkstra's review can be seen here: https://www.cs.utexas.edu/~EWD/ewd00xx/EWD37.PDF paul
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mi... Kevin Monceaux via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mi... Jon Elson via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe ... Gavin Scott via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe ... jim stephens via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe ... Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe ... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe ... Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe ... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe ... Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe ... Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe ... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe ... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe ... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mini Sellam Abraham via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mini Sytse van Slooten via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mini Rich Alderson via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mini Rich Alderson via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mini Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mini Jon Elson via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mini Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: mainframe vs mini Jay Jaeger via cctalk