> On Oct 1, 2024, at 10:54 AM, Jon Elson via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org> > wrote: > >> ... > The IBM 2314 was REALLY low tech. There was almost no electronics in the > drives! They has a read amp, a write amp and a hydraulic "stepper motor" > with mechanical detents that moved the heads in response to step in and step > out pulses from the control unit. > > IBM did know how to distill things down to the absolute minimum. Remember, > this was developed in the early 1960s and first shipped with the first 360's > in 1965. I haven't met a 2314, but I did see 2311 drives on a 360/44 and 1311 drives on a 1620. The 1311 is definitely hydraulic -- I learned that when ours sprung a leak and sprayed hydraulic fluid all over the system pack. It got fixed perfectly, though. So that drive technology may be older than 1965. paul
- [cctalk] Might be antique computer parts Van Snyder via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Might be antique computer par... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Might be antique computer... Wayne S via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Might be antique comp... Daniel Williams via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Might be antique computer... Jon Elson via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Might be antique comp... Bob Rosenbloom via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Might be antique ... ben via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Might be antique ... Jon Elson via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Might be ant... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Might be ant... Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Might be... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Might be ant... Tom Gardner via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Might be... Jon Elson via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Migh... Tom Gardner via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Migh... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Migh... Van Snyder via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Migh... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Migh... David Wise via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Migh... CAREY SCHUG via cctalk