On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 12:00 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: > Danny Backx wrote: > > > FYI I've just committed the code (changed as Pedro suggested). > > > > Great. But, you've missed bullet 1. I guess you have to go > through the upstream submission process to see the value of doing > it early... sigh...
Actually I did several modifications to try to follow the GNU coding
standards. That is what you're referring to, isn't it?
Please tell me where exactly do I not follow one now ? I'll fix.
Danny
--
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________ Cegcc-devel mailing list Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
