> From: cellml-discussion-boun...@cellml.org [mailto:cellml-discussion- > boun...@cellml.org] On Behalf Of Dougal Cowan > Sent: 17 December 2009 01:55 > To: cellml-discussion@cellml.org > Subject: [cellml-discussion] ABI CellML meeting minutes 2009-12-16 > > I have put the minutes from this week's meeting up at: > > http://www.cellml.org/community/meeting/minutes/2009/12.16
Just a quick comment about the minutes: - "Randall said we will need a good way to indicate which license applies to each model - possibly in metadata." -- Metadata seems like an obvious place indeed. One thing to keep in mind (and I am sure you guys did, but I didn't see any mention of it) is that the license under which a particular model comes should be very obvious to anyone using PMR2. In other words, someone shouldn't have to, say, download a model and then check its metadata so that he knows about its license. Alan _______________________________________________ cellml-discussion mailing list cellml-discussion@cellml.org http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
