We (Catherine, Poul and I) were thinking that there are basically
three places where you'd want to display / store this information
within PMR2: in the metadata itself (thereby allowing it to be
rendered by software, indexed and searched etc.), on the exposure
somewhere (perhaps a rendering of the metadata,) and in the proposed
blanket, site-wide 'terms of use' page.
As Catherine has mentioned in the relevant tracker item (don't have
the number on hand,) one of the issues which we must now decide on is
whether to require that all models in the repository abide by CC
attrib 3 or whether users can specify special cases.
Cheers,
James
On 18/12/2009, at 1:25 AM, Alan Garny wrote:
From: cellml-discussion-boun...@cellml.org [mailto:cellml-discussion-
boun...@cellml.org] On Behalf Of Dougal Cowan
Sent: 17 December 2009 01:55
To: cellml-discussion@cellml.org
Subject: [cellml-discussion] ABI CellML meeting minutes 2009-12-16
I have put the minutes from this week's meeting up at:
http://www.cellml.org/community/meeting/minutes/2009/12.16
Just a quick comment about the minutes:
- "Randall said we will need a good way to indicate which license
applies
to each model - possibly in metadata." -- Metadata seems like an
obvious
place indeed. One thing to keep in mind (and I am sure you guys did,
but I
didn't see any mention of it) is that the license under which a
particular
model comes should be very obvious to anyone using PMR2. In other
words,
someone shouldn't have to, say, download a model and then check its
metadata
so that he knows about its license.
Alan
_______________________________________________
cellml-discussion mailing list
cellml-discussion@cellml.org
http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
_______________________________________________
cellml-discussion mailing list
cellml-discussion@cellml.org
http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
